MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6940989123 · doi:10.11575/prism/40153

Breastfeeding intentions, difficulties, and outcomes in mothers with chronic physical health conditions: the Motherhood and Chronic Illness (MaCI) prospective cohort study

2022· other· en· W6940989123 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreastfeedingPregnancyProspective cohort studyCohort studyOdds ratioRelative riskBreast feedingCohort

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Breastfeeding from birth to 6 months has numerous benefits for maternal and child health. Mothers with chronic conditions are at risk for suboptimal breastfeeding outcomes, yet the underlying reasons for this are poorly understood. This thesis research investigated the factors associated with breastfeeding intentions, difficulties, and outcomes in mothers with chronic conditions. We conducted a prospective, community-based pregnancy cohort study called the Motherhood and Chronic Illness (MaCI) Study following 405 women from Alberta who reported living with a long-term physical health condition, carrying a singleton pregnancy, and intending to try breastfeeding. Women completed questionnaires at 32 weeks gestation, 6 weeks postpartum, and 6 months postpartum (overall response rate, 86.7%). In the prenatal period, we found that women who perceived their chronic condition to worsen during pregnancy were less likely to plan to exclusively breastfeed to 6 months per the global recommendation (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.50, 95% CI 0.30–0.82). From birth to 6 weeks postpartum, we identified three clusters of breastfeeding difficulties corresponding to physiologically expected lactation changes (51.1% of women), low milk production (15.4%), and ineffective latch (33.5%). Mothers with endocrine (adjusted relative risk ratio [RRR] 2.41, 95% CI 1.13–5.13), cardiovascular (adjusted RRR 2.87, 95% CI 1.02–8.09), and gastrointestinal (adjusted RRR 2.57, 95% CI 1.13–5.82) conditions were more likely to belong to the low milk production cluster and mothers with gastrointestinal (adjusted RRR 2.47, 95% CI 1.27–4.81) conditions were more likely to belong to the ineffective latch cluster, relative to the physiologically expected cluster. By 6 months postpartum, we found that one third (31.2%) of mothers had stopped breastfeeding, nearly all of whom did so earlier than planned. Compared to mothers who adhered to their pre-existing medications, mothers who did not adhere to pre-existing medications had shorter breastfeeding duration (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.69, 95% CI 1.04–2.74) and greater odds of earlier than planned breastfeeding cessation (adjusted OR 1.85, 1.01–3.41). The MaCI Study highlighted three unique determinants of breastfeeding in mothers with chronic conditions, which can be addressed through person-centred support that jointly considers the ways in which breastfeeding patterns influence, and are influenced by, chronic condition status and management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)→Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions→French-language works237,207→