Value of resting state electroencephalogram in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BackgroundThe diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease （AD） still faces great challenges， and the advantage of electroencephalogram （EEG） diagnosis lies in its portable and non-invasive nature， so the EEG diagnosis of AD has occupied an important place in clinical research.ObjectiveTo evaluate the value of resting state EEG for AD diagnosis， and to provide references for early recognition of AD in clinical practice.MethodsClinical data of AD patients （n=59） in an Inpatient Geriatric Psychiatry Unit of Shenzhen Kangning Hospital from May 2019 to May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed， and healthy elderly individuals attending outpatient clinics at the hospital during the same period were enrolled as control group （n=54）. Eight-channel resting state EEG data were acquired， and the absolute power values in the α， β， θ and δ frequency bands and the α/θ ratio were obtained and calculated using Fast Fourier Transform （FFT）. Cognitive function assessments of patients were done by Mini-Mental State Examination （MMSE） and Montreal Cognitive Assessment （MoCA）. Spearman correlation analysis was used to examine the correlation between EEG findings and MMSE and MoCA scores of AD patienrs. Logistic regression prediction model for AD was built using currently available EEG and clinical variables， and the model performance was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic （ROC） curve and the area under curve （AUC）.ResultsThe θ-band absolute powers in the right mid-frontal （F4） and mid-lateral （F7， F8） regions were higher in AD patients than those in healthy controls， with statistically significant difference （t=-2.844， -2.825， -3.014， P<0.05 or 0.01）. The absolute powers of α/θ ratio in prefrontal （Fp1， Fp2）， mid-frontal （F3， F4） and mid-lateral （F7， F8） regions showed a notable reduction in AD patients compared with healthy controls， with statistical difference （t=2.081， 2.327， 3.423， 2.358， 3.272， 2.445， P<0.05 or 0.01）. Spearman correlation analysis denoted that MMSE score was positively correlated with the absolute powers of α-band， β-band and α/θ ratio （r=0.206， 0.288， 0.372， P<0.05 or 0.01）. MoCA score was positively correlated with β absolute powers and α/θ ratio （r=0.201， 0.315， P<0.05 or 0.01）， and negatively correlated with θ absolute power （r=-0.218， P<0.05）. ROC curve revealed an AUC of 0.882 （95% CI： 0.820~0.943）， a sensitivity of 0.966 and a specificity of 0.673 for the AD prediction model based on EEG variables， while the prediction model for AD using comprehensive variables achieved better predictive efficacy， reaching an AUC， sensitivity and specificity of 0.946 （95% CI： 0.905~0.986）， 0.948 and 0.873， respectively.ConclusionResting state EEG of AD patients is correlated with cognitive function， and are of great value in the diagnosis of AD， with θ absolute power and α/θ ratio in EEG being the most strongly correlated with AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".