FearTalk 4 (Part 1): With Nicole Rallis & Barbara Bickel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This FearTalk 4 (in a series) is Part 1, with a Part 2 to follow, where R. Michael Fisher hosts an emergent authentic dialogue with two women who have thought deeply about the divine feminine, slow activism and scholarship, as well as exploring their own fear, anxiety and the context of how women are particularly susceptible to the pathological patriarchy as part of everyday living. As artists and researchers they explore the role of art as medicine, the role of dreams, imagination, and intuitions of hauntings and many other topics that are part of an emancipatory process working with intuitive darkness as transformation. This FearTalk 4 is dedicated to Dr. Carl Leggo, UBC for his inspiring work over many years, and may his recovery from cancer proceed in healing ways for all involved. [Note: Carl passed away March 6, 2019, I wrote a blog memorium: https://fearlessnessmovement.ning.com... Nicole Rallis is a writer, documentary filmmaker and aspiring a/r/tographer. She is currently a second year PhD student at the University of British Columbia, and a research fellow with the UBC Geography, Urban Studies Lab. She has completed an interdisciplinary Master of Arts in Globalization Studies from the Institute on Globalization and the Human Condition at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario. You can find out more about Nicoleês writing and research at: https://ubc.academia.edu/NicoleRallis... Barbara Bickel is an artist, researcher, and educator currently practicing in Calgary, Alberta, Canada where she co-founded Studio M*: A Research Creation Lab Intersecting Arts, Culture and Healing in 2017. An Associate Professor of Art Education, Emeritas at Southern Illinois University Carbondale, USA she teaches art as an inquiry, healing and interdisciplinary meaning making process. Her art and research interests include arts-based research, trance-based inquiry, collaboration, socially engaged art, connective aesthetics, spirituality, matrixial theory, and restorative and transformative learning. Barbaraês art/research/teaching work can be viewed at: http://www.barbarabickel.ca/ https://studiom.space/
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.134 | 0.063 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".