Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ffl ..._.".-Howe woul urge hit delicacy farther, and repeated nit affertions, that no failure of refpect was intended, , He then faid, that' he would endeavour, as well as.he could, to recolleft gen.Howe's fentiments on the letter and fefolves of ,eongre.lifent.him a few .daysbefore,-re lifting the treatment of our prifoners in Canada.," 1 hat the af-: fairs of Canada were in another department, not lub-Vjecl to the controul of gen.Howe, but that he and lord Howe utterly disapproved of every infringement on 'the rights f humanity.",CoI.Patterfon then took a paper out of his pocket, and after looking it over, faid.ne had cxprefled f arly the words.Gen. Washington then iaid, that ,B*.had alfo forwarded a copy of the refolvei t gen.Burgoyae.To which col. Patterfnn replied, 'lie did.DO* doubt a-proper attention would be paid to them, and that be (gen.Wafhington) was^fenfible that "..cruelty war not the charaCteriltfc of the Britim nation.Col. Patterfon then proceeded to fay he hail it in charge .tomention the cafe of gen.Prefect, who they were informed was treated with ruch rigour, thai, under his .ageand intirmitie>, fafal cohfequencei might be apprehended.Gen. Wafllington replied, "that gen.Prefect's treatment had not fallen under his notice*; that all perfons under his particular direction he had treated with kindnefs, and made their dtuation as eafy xiid comfortable that he did not know where gen.Prefcot n.WheTthe veftel, were paffed, *jf*g" tt 'both fides.,VWe had the misfortune of lofing _one "wLr" wounded, i. one Freeman, a fer,eant ir.cap.2K company.;,hi wound
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it