MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6941173876 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-6623

Abstract 6623: Ultra-deep multi-omics sequencing to identify drivers of glioblastoma recurrence and evolution

2025· article· en· W6941173876 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsToronto Public HealthOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPTENDNA methylationGermlineMethylationCopy-number variationSomatic evolution in cancerKRASWhole genome sequencingDeep sequencing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent and deadliest form of brain tumor with a median patient survival of 15 months after diagnosis. However, the mechanisms of tumor recurrence and the molecular alterations contributing to therapy resistance remain poorly understood. To address this challenge, we performed ultra-deep whole transcriptome, whole genome, and nanopore long-read sequencing of matched primary and recurrent GBMs of 12 adult patients with matching germline controls (fresh-frozen blood) and patient treatment and clinical histories. We generated a multi-omics datasets of single nucleotide variants (SNVs), structural variants (SVs), copy number alterations, genome-wide DNA methylation patterns, and transcriptomics. Our long-read sequencing data provided nucleotide-level methylation data to analyze genome-wide methylation patterns and high-quality structural variants for profiling complex genomic rearrangements and identifying episomes. Major changes between primary and recurrent samples in SVs, such as selection for EGFR translocations in recurrent tumors, and nucleotide-level methylation patterns, such as increased methylation of the FUBP1 and IDH1 promoters in recurrent tumors, were only detectable using long-read sequencing strategies, emphasizing the value of long-read sequencing in evolutionary analyses. We identified distinct mutational processes responsible for primary and recurrent tumor mutations and driving evolution of a recurrent tumor with therapeutic resistance. We found evidence of multi-omics dysregulation of oncogenes including promoter silencing by methylation and SVs selecting for the EGFR-vIII variant. Extensive inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity and evidence of clonal selection in recurrent tumors was detected from ultra-deep whole genome sequencing, including selection for EGFR SNVs and PTEN and RB1 copy number deletions in recurrent tumors. We found an enrichment of SVs and epigenetic modifications in recurrent tumors, such as increased methylation of CDK4 and CDK6 promoters, and a depletion of classical tumor drivers, such as EGFR and CDK4 amplifications. Our integrative pathway analysis of multi-omics data of differentially methylated and expressed genes between primary and recurrent GBMs prioritized several glioma pathways enriched in recurrent tumors associated with glioma processes such as gliogenesis and angiogenesis. Our cohort had comparable mutation rates and processes as the Glioma Longitudinal Analysis (GLASS) consortium of paired primary-recurrent GBMs. However, our unique dataset of paired primary and recurrent GBMs provides an unprecedented multi-omics, multi-layered view of the genetic, transcriptomic, and epigenetic processes of GBM evolution. Citation Format: Alexander Bahcheli, Philip Zuzarte, Sunit Das, Jared Simpson, Jüri Reimand. Ultra-deep multi-omics sequencing to identify drivers of glioblastoma recurrence and evolution [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 6623.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions→French-language works237,207→