Situating Direct-Action AIDS Activists: The Development of Organizational Responses to Vancouver’s HIV Epidemic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scholarship on the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the United States and Canada has foregrounded the importance of direct-action activism within gay community responses to the epidemic. However, community mobilization efforts in Vancouver were varied and did not begin with direct-action activism. Drawing from oral history interviews with long-term survivors who are living with HIV and caregivers, I argue that the story of Vancouver’s HIV/AIDS epidemic cannot be adequately told unless early AIDS service organizations (ASOs) are placed front and centre. While maintaining an apolitical façade, early ASOs frequently took up roles that blurred the line between activism and care. Direct-action activist organizations built on these existing organizational responses to the epidemic in Vancouver, such as the safe sex education initiatives and treatment advocacy undertaken by the city’s first ASOs, and crucial continuities and overlaps existed within various community organizations’ political goals if not political tactics. While the development of various organizational responses to the epidemic in Vancouver mirrored the trajectory followed in other Canadian and US contexts, political mobilization in Vancouver ultimately developed in response to the particular local political conditions faced by the city’s gay community, particularly the inaction and homophobia of the provincial Vander Zalm government. In order to understand community responses to HIV/AIDS in Vancouver, we need to broaden our conceptions of activism to make space for various, complementary organizational responses to the epidemic alongside overt acts of resistance and protest, and pay close attention to the shifting local political context in the city.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.037 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".