Bibliographic record
Abstract
• National Visions, National Blindness: Canadian Art and Identities in the 1920s by Leslie Dawn -Reviewed by Gerta Moray (pgs: 179-83) • The Mapmaker's Eye: Douglas Thompson on the Columbia Plateau by Jack Nisbet -Reviewed by I.S. MacLaren (pgs: 183-6) • Native Seattle: Histories from the Crossing-Over Place by Coll Thrush -Reviewed by Jean Barman (pgs: 186-7) • Athapaskan Migration: The Archaeology of Eagle Lake, British Columbia by Martin Magne, R. G. Matson -Reviewed by Chris Springer (pgs: 187-90) • Sharks of the Pacific Northwest: Including Oregon, Washington, British Columbia, and Alaska by Alessandro De Maddalena -Reviewed by Anna Hall (pgs: 190-1) • Blue Valley: An Ecological Memoir by Luanne Armstrong -Reviewed by Anne Edwards (pgs: 191-3) • Harbour City: Nanaimo in Transition, 1920-1967 by Jan Peterson -Reviewed by Patrick A. Dunae (pgs: 193-5) • The Comox Valley: Courtnay, Comox, Cumberland, and Area by Paula Wild -Reviewed by Jamie Morton (pgs: 195-7) -Reviewed by (pgs: 197-8) • River of Memory: The Everlasting Columbia by William D. Layman -Reviewed by Bruce Shelvey (pgs: 198-200)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.594 | 0.579 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".