Break Point: Fourth World Nation's International Resistance to Canada during Patriation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada’s Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau announced a “White Paper” in 1969 that his government would unilaterally take Native lands by declaring Canada an independent state with its own Constitution. “I don’t think that we should encourage the Indians to feel that their Treaties (with the United Kingdom) should last forever within Canada.” Just as all of his predecessors proclaimed their intention to do “away with the tribal system” from Canada’s first Prime Minister John Alexander Macdonald in 1887, for the following 87 years Canada’s government worked to dispossess the original nations of their land and to make “Indians disappear.” Trudeau’s unwillingness to engage leaders of First Nations on the basis of mutual respect proved to be the “Break Point.” Grand Chief George Manuel and Band Council leaders from across the land responded to Trudeau’s challenge by organizing the Constitution Express as a wall of resistance to halt Canada’s confiscation of traditionally held territories and resources. The massively organized counter to Trudeau’s government from 1977 well into the 1980s involved local, countrywide and international initiatives to affirm the inherent powers of self-government in the First Nations. This essay tells the untold story of the political and diplomatic actions taken by Indian leaders to push back on Canada’s threat to their existence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.045 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.015 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".