MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6942496799 · doi:10.14288/1.0428849

A case-crossover investigation of associations between extreme heat and pediatric health

2023· article· en· W6942496799 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsthmaPediatric hospitalEmergency departmentPsychological interventionMalnutritionHealth careConditional logistic regression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Globally, climates are changing causing more frequent and severe extreme heat events (EHEs). In Canada, annual EHE frequency is anticipated to double in just the next 3 decades. A large body of literature links EHEs to multiple health endpoints, including heatstroke and exacerbating medical conditions. However, there remains a paucity of knowledge concerning the specific health outcomes associated with heat in children. Compared to adults, children have higher surface area to mass ratios, lower sweating capacity, higher temperature at which sweating begins, lower cardiac output, and lower blood volume. They are also believed to be more vulnerable to EHEs due to external factors including activity patterns and dependence on caregivers. METHODS: This space-time stratified case-crossover analysis of Ontario’s 2005-2015 emergency healthcare data applied conditional quasi-Poisson regression to assess associations between FSA-level EHE exposure with primary causes of pediatric emergency hospital admissions and emergency department (ED) visits. RESULTS: Positive associations were found both for pediatric hospital admissions and ED visits for primary causes of asthma; general heat-related illness, heatstroke; and lower respiratory infections. General injuries and transportation related injuries were negatively associated with both pediatric hospital admissions and ED visits. EHEs increased risk of pediatric hospital admissions for causes of general respiratory illnesses by 26% (CI:14%-40%), asthma by 29% (CI:16%-44%); general infectious and parasitic diseases by 36% (CI:24%-50%), lower respiratory infections by 50% (CI:36%-67%), and enteritis by 19% (CI:7%-32%). EHEs also increased risk of ED visits for asthma by 18% (CI:7%-29%) and lower respiratory infections by 10% (CI:0%-21%). All-cause hospital admissions and ED visits were not associated with EHEs. However, in stratified analyses all-cause hospital admissions were positively associated with EHEs for children 13-18 and males, and all-cause ED visits were negatively associated with EHEs among children 5-12. CONCLUSION: EHEs elevate risk of pediatric emergency healthcare utilization for respiratory illnesses, asthma; infectious and parasitic diseases, lower respiratory infections, and enteritis in Ontario. It is imperative that policies and programs be tailored to reflect the specific heat related vulnerabilities of children to respiratory and infections illnesses in face of a rapidly warming climate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFrench-language works237,207