Respondents in the Canadian Dietetic Association survey of dietetic personnel in British Columbia : a preliminary report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a result of a changing economy and changing patterns of health care delivery in Canada, there have been many modifications in the roles of workers in the nutrition field, and many more are projected. Several manpower questions have been posed to the Canadian Dietetic Association by these changes. How many dietitians are working in Canada at the present time and where are they working? What changes are foreseen in health care delivery which will affect the roles of nutrition workers and ultimately the competencies required to fill those roles? How many people will be required to fill vacancies and future new openings? With these and other questions in mind, the Canadian Dietetic Association decided in 1977 to undertake a Canada-wide study of the need for nutrition personnel, which would have as its objectives the following: 1. The establishment of standards of nutritional service necessary to ensure an adequate nutritional level in the population. 2. The defining of roles for each level of nutritional worker in the health field and description of those competencies required to fulfill that role. 3. The establishment of an inventory (data base) of employers of nutritional workers and a basic data file on workers employed at these institutions and agencies. 4. The projection of trends in stock, based upon certain policy decisions. 5. The establishment of requirements for nutrition workers based upon trends in stock and possible policy decisions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".