MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6942555375 · doi:10.14288/1.0052510

Seismic interferometry using non-volcanic tremor in Cascadia

2010· article· en· W6942555375 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeismic interferometryNoise (video)InterferometrySubductionSeismic arraySurface (topology)Surface waveField (mathematics)Transverse plane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Green’s function for a source and receiver located on the Earth’s surface over a heterogeneous medium can be recovered by cross-correlating and integrating the transmission response of noise fields recorded at the two surface locations. This assertion relies on the assumption that the noise field is generated by random, independent sources distributed over a surface surrounding the heterogeneity, with the dominant contributions to the integral over source location occurring at stationary points of the integrand for a given structure. The majority of seismological research on seismic interferometry to date has focussed on surface wave applications, due in part to the general absence of deep, high-frequency noise sources. In this study, I investigate the possibility of using the recently documented, deep-seated, non-volcanic tremor on the Cascadia subduction zone as a noise source for seismic interferometry to recover scattered body wave contributions to the surface Green’s function. Tremors in the vicinity of the POLARIS-BC array for 2004 and 2005 were documented, and data for stations TWKB, MGCB and LZB were filtered and cross-correlated for all components of stations pairs TWKB-MCGB and TWKB-LZB. TWKB and MGCB correlations are generally superior, generating a large highly reproducible arrival at 4.5 s in 2004 and 2005 for combinations of vertical with radial or transverse components. TWKB and LZB correlations are less reproducible, but still yield, for the same components, a strong arrival at 3.5 s for 2005. Upon consideration of source/receiver geometry, polarity and appearance at positive versus negative lags, I interpret these arrivals to represent contributions travelling as S-to-P-to-S en route from source to free-surface to scatterer to receiver. Arrival times suggest that these signals originate at depths between 9 and 12 km, coincident with an interval of strong reflectivity imaged in the 1987 Lithoprobe Vancouver Island transect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Collections→Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions→French-language works237,207→