畫紋帶神獸鏡の東傳 --型式と鉛同位體比からみた九子派の動態--
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the Sichuan Basin, there were two groups of mirror workshops in the 2nd century, the Guanghan 廣漢 school and the Jiuzi 九子 school. The Guanghan school created the motif of divinities and animals (Shen-shou 神獸), animal heads (Shou-shou 獸首) and eight-phoenix (Ba-feng 八鳳) mirrors by order from Shang-fang 尙方of the Imperial Department, while Jiuzi school created the mirrors with figures of deities on three panels 三段式神仙鏡, which were distributed mainly in the local area. In the third quarter of the 2nd century, the Jiuzi school imitated the Shen-shou mirrors with ring-like nipples (環狀乳) of the Guanghan school, and after trial and error, created the contraposition styles(對置式) of Shen-shou mirrors. Since this type mirrors are mainly excavated from the middle reaches of the Changjiang River, it has been thought that Jiuzi's workshops were relocated from the Sichuan. But three specimens of Jiuzi's mirrors found to contain lead of anomalous isotope ratios called Mississippi Valley type (MVT) in isotope geology, and these mines are found in a border region between Sichuan and Yunnan Provinces. I propose that this type of Shen-shou mirrors were consistently made in the Sichuan and may have been transported to the eastern region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".