Bibliographic record
Abstract
A dataset containing 37561 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query: { "and" : [ "TaxonKey is one of (Stenophyella macreta Horvath, 1914, Noteolethaeus armstrongi Woodward & Slater, 1962, Anisynta sphenosema (Meyrick & Lower, 1902), Dira oxylus Trimen, 1806, Gnophodes parmeno Doubleday, 1849, Paralethe dendrophilus (Trimen, 1862), Pseudonympha hippia Cramer, 1782, Ypthima impura Elwes & Edwards, 1893, Borbo detecta (Trimen, 1893), Coenyra hebe (Trimen, 1864), Borbo fallax (Gaede, 1916), Borbo lugens (Hopffer, 1855), Metisella malgacha (Boisduval, 1833), Coenyra aurantiaca Aurivillius, 1911, Neita durbani Trimen, 1887, Stygionympha robertsoni (Riley, 1932), Stygionympha vigilans Trimen, 1887, Pseudonympha magoides van Son, 1955, Pelopidas thrax (Hübner, 1821), Metisella metis (Linnaeus, 1764), Bicyclus anynana (Butler, 1879), Borbo borbonica (Boisduval, 1833), Bicyclus safitza (Westwood, 1850), Euzophera alpherakyella Ragonot, 1887, Hyalophora kasloensis Cockerell, 1914, Macropsis elaeagnicola Dubovsky, 1966, Macropsis elaeagni Emeljanov, 1964, Diaspiniphagus moeris (Walker, 1839), Tamarixia poddubnyi (Kostjukov, 1978), Psyllaephagus georgicus Yasnosh & Japoshvili, 1999, Psyllaephagus elaeagni Trjapitzin, 1967, Sympiesis elaeagni Myartseva, 1997, Eurytoma elistae Zerova, 1995, Syrphophagus elaeagni (Trjapitzin, 1969), Thysanus ater Walker, 1840, Diplodia elaeagni Pass., Tympanuchus cupido (Linnaeus, 1758), Cacopsylla fulguralis (Kuwayama, 1908), Anarsia protensa Park, 1995, Septoria elaeagni (Chevall.) Desm., Graphium cloanthus Westwood, 1841, Fusarium sacchari (E.J.Butler) W.Gams, Fusarium incarnatum (Desm.) Sacc., Elaeidobius kamerunicus (Faust, 1898) Haran, Beaudoin-Ollivier, Benoit & Kuschel, 2020, Macaca nemestrina (Linnaeus, 1766), Arctelene arcuata (Moore, 1882), Gastroplakaeis rufescens Aurivillius, 1905, Macroplectra gigantea Hering, 1931, Homaloxestis cholopis (Meyrick, 1906), Ploneta bradleyi (Holloway, 1986))", "HasCoordinate is true", "HasGeospatialIssue is false" ] } The dataset includes 37561 records from 248 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0009383-250515123054153/datasets/export for details. Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.409 | 0.491 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".