MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Granary Philosophy——Philosophical Thinking on the Intelligence of Grain Storage Science and Technology

2023· article· en· W6943733184 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI and Big Data Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGranaryPoliticsFood securityChinaTechnology managementTechnical managementFood processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The influence of science and technology on cognitive change has a long history, which lead to forming philosophy of science and philosophy of technology respectively. The development of grain storage technology in China has gone through three stages: the initial exploration before the reform and opening up, the construction of intellingence in the past 10 years modern granaries in 30 years after the reform and opening up, and the creation of digital. The scientific and technological progress of grain storage in China has been witnessed by all, including building a modern granary with "four in one" new grain storage technology, to forming the world's largest grain and food networking with information technology, original multi-field coupling and bio-field theory, and realizing the dynamic supervision of grain reserves with grain cloud image scanning technology. In the new era, the political and economic situations have not changed significantly in the past century, and the new requirements of China's second centenary goal for food security and the impact of the fourth industrial revolution have made the trend of food science and technology becoming more and more intelligent. Based on the accumulation of scientific and technological achievements in grain storage practice for more than 40 years in China, combined with the team's research on multi-field coupling and bio-field theory of grain storage, dynamic supervision of cloud image of grain reserves, 5T information management of natural block chain for grain storage, and intelligent EAT window measurement and control methods for grain drying, this paper attempted to take the basic idea of "one divides into two, two divides into three, and three generates changes" on the basis of deconstructing the micro and macro ternary microstructure of grain storage system. Taking the joint driving of mechanism and data as the intelligent strategy, the granary philosophy is introduced to improve the recognition of existing scientific and technological achievements. The granary philosophy also guided the exploration of grain storage technology in the new era, and provided support for building a high-quality intelligent food system. The granary philosophy is a deep reflection on the practical situation of grain storage, and has certain universality, which originates from grain storage practice, but is not limited to grain storage practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0110.004
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.313
GPT teacher head0.526
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it