MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6943885308 · doi:10.17632/ypz48nbpmn.1

Supplementary material for "Herd-level prevalence of bovine leukemia virus, Salmonella Dublin and Neospora caninum in Alberta, Canada, dairy herds using ELISA on bulk tank milk samples"

2024· dataset· en· W6943885308 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and Retrovirus Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBulk tankNeospora caninumHerdBovine leukemia virusSalmonellaDairy cattleNeospora

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supplementary materials for the manuscript titled, "Herd-level prevalence of bovine leukemia virus, Salmonella Dublin and Neospora caninum in Alberta, Canada, dairy herds using ELISA on bulk tank milk samples" by Shaukat et al. 2024. It includes, Fig S1, Fig S2, Fig S3, Fig S4, Fig S5, and Fig S6. Supplementary Figure S1. Frequency distribution of Percentage Inhibition (PI%) of ELISA detecting antibodies against bovine leukemia virus in bulk tank milk samples from Alberta dairy herds across 4 timepoints. The red dotted lines indicate the cut-off values of ≥30 and <20% for categorizing positive and negative samples, respectively. Supplementary Figure S2. Spread of the Percentage Inhibition (PI%) of ELISA detecting antibodies against bovine leukemia virus in bulk tank milk samples from Alberta dairy herds for positive, negative and suspected samples across 4 timepoints. Supplementary Figure S3. Frequency distribution of Percent Positivity (PP%) of ELISA detecting antibodies against Salmonella Dublin in bulk tank milk samples from Alberta dairy herds across 4 timepoints. The red dotted line indicates the cut-off value of ≥35% for categorizing positive and negative samples. Supplementary Figure S4. Spread of the Percent Positivity (PP%) for ELISA detecting antibodies against Salmonella Dublin in bulk tank milk samples from Alberta dairy herds for positive and negative samples across 4 timepoints. Supplementary Figure S5. Frequency distribution of Sample to Positive Ratio (S/P) of ELISA detecting antibodies against Neospora caninum in bulk tank milk samples from Alberta dairy herds across 4 timepoints. The red dotted line shows the cut-off value of ≥0.50 for categorizing positive and negative samples. Supplementary Figure S6. Spread of the sample to positive ratios for ELISA detecting antibodies against Neospora caninum in bulk tank milk samples from Alberta dairy herds for positive and negative samples across 4 timepoints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score0.677

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6800.106

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)Same topicT-cell and Retrovirus StudiesFrench-language works237,207