MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Remote Sensing and Modelling, Ground-based Aerosol Vertical Profile, Oil Sands Region

2013· dataset· en· W6944087166 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueECCC Data Catalogue · 2013
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsGovernment of QuebecGovernment of CanadaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLidarBackscatter (email)AerosolAtmosphere (unit)Atmospheric opticsOil sandsParticle (ecology)Planetary boundary layer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LIDAR (LIght Detection And Ranging) is a measurement technique capable of observing the complex vertical structure of the atmosphere. Specifically, information can be provided related to the existence and extent of aerosols and clouds with high spatial (4 m vertical) and temporal (1 min) resolution, making it well-suited for understanding atmospheric dynamics and transport processes. ECCC researchers designed, built and deployed autonomous ground-based aerosol LIDAR systems to three different locations in the oil sands region – AMS13 (November 2012 to September 2013), Oski-ôtin (October 2013 to present) and Mannix (July 2013 to March 2016). Details of the instrument by Strawbridge, 2013 can be found in Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 801-816, 2013. The Oski-ôtin LIDAR system was upgraded in November 2016 to include additional aerosol channels, ozone and night time water vapour profiles. Three LIDAR image products are produced daily at each location. The first plot (Figure 1a) is backscatter ratio at 532nm, which is plotted from ground to 13 km using a logarithmic colour bar as a function of the time of the day. The second plot (Figure 1b) is also the backscatter ratio at 532nm, but plotted from ground to 3 km and using a linear colour bar to easily identify relative increases and decreases in particle concentration in the lower atmosphere and boundary layer. The backscatter ratio is an optical quantity that is proportional to particle concentration. The black vertical bands on those images represent regions where LIDAR data are not available due to the presence of optically thick clouds or when the LIDAR system does not operate such as during precipitation events or instrument maintenance. The third plot (Figure 2) is the time dependence of the depolarization ratio at 532nm or 355nm using a linear colour scale. The depolarization ratio provides information about the shape of the particles. Together, the backscatter and depolarization products can provide information on the altitude and extent of particulate matter from biomass burning, mineral dust, industrial plumes, water clouds and ice clouds. The LIDAR data can also be used to identify long-range transport events, dispersion and mixing of plumes and boundary layer height. LIDAR observations also provide the vertical context for other ground and remote sensing systems at the measurement site and vertical profiles for model verification and validation. (See LIDAR Image Description-EngFr.pdf )

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECCC Data CatalogueFrench-language works237,207