MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6944561151 · doi:10.21227/54cn-v724

BPPV videos dataset samples

2022· dataset· en· W6944561151 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE DataPort · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHead (geology)Eye movementEye trackingSnippetAction (physics)Frame (networking)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

- There are six folders corresponding to 6 types of BPPV disorders.- Each folder has one sample. Each class is specified by the typical movement of the eye. +) Lt_Geo_BPPV: eye beats toward the ground, beats stronger to the left side (turn head left).+) Rt_Geo_BPPV: eye beats toward the ground, beats stronger to the right side (turn head right).+) Lt_Apo_BPPV: eye beats toward the sky, beats stronger to the left side (turn head right).+) Rt_Apo_BPPV: eye beats toward the sky, beats stronger to the right side (turn head left).+) Lt_PC_BPPV: eye beats slightly up and rotates clockwise (often at hanging left position).+) Rt_PC_BPPV: eye beats slightly up and rotates counter-clockwise (often at hanging right position). - Each folder contains a video (*.avi format) and a temporal labeled file (*.mat format).- The '*.mat' file can be read by matlab, that stores the 'fr' and 'label' variable.- Each action of the patient is labeled with the start and end frame ID. - Actions are marked as follows: +) 'sitting' is labeled as '1' +) 'head turns left' is labeled as '2' +) 'head turns right' is labeled as '3' +) 'head hanging left' is labeled as '4' +) 'head hanging right' is labeled as '5' +) 'lying down' is labeled as '6' +) 'head bending' is labeled as '7' An example: postures of patient are labeled in the 'Class2_100030.mat' (Lt_Geo_BPPV folder) as follows:'fr''label'22211035116142166321781318373220622271227751319013208533135378013947139644406044496178051103061186651947525776330764067 TRANSLATE with x EnglishArabicHebrewPolishBulgarianHindiPortugueseCatalanHmong DawRomanianChinese SimplifiedHungarianRussianChinese TraditionalIndonesianSlovakCzechItalianSlovenianDanishJapaneseSpanishDutchKlingonSwedishEnglishKoreanThaiEstonianLatvianTurkishFinnishLithuanianUkrainianFrenchMalayUrduGermanMalteseVietnameseGreekNorwegianWelshHaitian CreolePersian // TRANSLATE with COPY THE URL BELOW Back EMBED THE SNIPPET BELOW IN YOUR SITE Enable collaborative features and customize widget: Bing Webmaster PortalBack//

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.042

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE DataPortFrench-language works237,207