MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Evaluation of the Prevalence of Hypokalemia and Hypomagnesemia in the VGH and BC Wide PeritonealDialysis Population and Frequency and Cost of Prescription of Potassium and Magnesium Supplements

2017· other· en· W6945935210 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypokalemiaHypomagnesemiaPotassiumPopulationMagnesiumMedical prescription

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Potassium and magnesium are minerals essential in the functioning of the human body, and low levels of either may adversely affect normal neuromuscular, cardiovascular, and metabolic processes. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are at increased risk for hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia due to continuous loss of these minerals via dialysate dwells. There is no current funding for potassium or magnesium supplements through the BC Provincial Renal Agency (BC PRA); thus, expanding BC PRA formulary coverage to include these supplements may increase accessibility and affordability, and improve PD patient outcomes.Objectives:To determine the one-year prevalence rate of hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia, and to assess the one-year frequency and cost of prescription of potassium and magnesium supplements in the Vancouver General Hospital (VGH) and BC wide PD patient population. Methods:This was a multi-center, retrospective review utilizing the Patient Records and Outcome Management Information System (PROMIS) database. All BC patients on PD at any point between May 1, 2017 to April 30, 2018 were included. Hypokalemia was defined as K < 3.5 mmol/L and hypomagnesemia was defined as Mg < 0.7 mmol/L. Yearly cost estimates of potassium and magnesium supplementation were based on unit costs and dispensing fees provided by MacDonaldu2019s Renal Pharmacy and Laurel Prescriptions.Results:For all PD patients in BC (n=1217), 97.5% of patients had serum potassium levels checked at least every 3 months; however, the frequency of serum magnesium level monitoring was much lower at 58.3% of patients. The prevalence of hypokalemia was 45.6% with 25.5% of patients on potassium supplements, and the prevalence of hypomagnesemia was 27.5% with 4.1% of patients on magnesium supplements. The one-year cost estimates for potassium and magnesium supplementation for all BC PD patients were $15,110 and $2,209, respectively. The prevalence of hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia were higher than the actual prescription of potassium and magnesium supplements, respectively. Cost may present as a barrier, even in patients with private health insurance. Compared to other nutritional supplements and hyperkalemia exchange resins listed on the BC PRA formulary, potassium and magnesium supplements have similar or lower costs. Conclusion:We would propose that potassium and magnesium supplements be added to the BC Provincial Renal Agency dialysis formulary for improved PD patient outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library)French-language works237,207