MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6945997343 · doi:10.25940/roper-31097951

Stony Brook Poll # 2005-HLTHA: Health Pulse of America 7, February, 2005

2005· other· en· W6945997343 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRoper Center for Public Opinion Research iPOLL · 2005
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRespondentSocial securityHealth and Retirement StudyGovernment (linguistics)Retirement ageSolvencySocial Security Act

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most important problem facing this country today (1); most important health problem facing Americans today (1); George W. Bush job performance (3); view of Social Security program (1); investing a portion of Social Security taxes in U.S. stock market (5); respondent's entitlements upon reaching retirement age (1); Social Security as source of income when respondent retires (1); concern about having enough money to retire when the time comes (1); at what age would respondent like to retire (1); at what age does respondent expect to retire (1); concern about having to retire later than respondent would like (2); concern about having to retire earlier than respondent would like (3); at what age did respondent retire (2); view of Medicare (1); future of Social Security/future of Medicare is of greater concern to respondent (1); confidence that Medicare will provide respondent with adequate health coverage by the time respondent reaches retirement age (1); concern about having enough money in retirement to cover health-related expenses (1); percentage of retirement income respondent currently spends on out-of-pocket health costs (1); Congress should/should not change law and make it legal for states to purchase drugs from Canada (1); Medicare law should/should not be changed to allow federal government to bargain with pharmaceutical companies (1); stem cell research (2); abortion (4); monetary awards in medical malpractice suits (3); did/did not watch State of the Union address (1); respondent's health insurance coverage (2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6740.517

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRoper Center for Public Opinion Research iPOLLSame topicSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeFrench-language works237,207