MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Relationship Between Mmn And Real-Life Functioning In Subjects With Schizophrenia

2017· other· en· W6946362188 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurocognitiveMismatch negativitySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Positive and Negative Syndrome ScaleContext (archaeology)Depression (economics)PsychosisCognitionScale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. Despite the development of successful treatments of psychotic symptoms, the impairment in real-life functioning in subjects with schizophrenia (SCZs) remains an unmet need in their management. Recent studies suggested that functioning of SCZs was associated with impairment in mismatch negativity (MMN), an event-related potential reflecting pre-attentive processing. However, these studies did not clarify whether this relationship is a direct one or reflects a cross-correlation with other variables. Objectives. Our study was designed to investigate differences between SCZs and healthy controls (HCs) on MMN amplitude and its relationships with real-life functioning domains in SCZs.Methods. In the context of a multicenter study of the Italian Network for Research on Psychoses, pitch- (p-MMN) and duration-deviant (d-MMN) MMNs were recorded in 125 chronic SCZs and 61 HCs. Within SCZs, we assessed psychopathology, neurocognitive functions; functioning was measured with the Specific Level of Functioning Scale (SLOF). Multiple regression was used to predict functioning using MMN, age, gender, duration of illness, neurocognitive composite score of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia total score, negative symptom domains of the Brief Negative Symptom Scale, positive and disorganization dimensions of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) as independent variables.Results. SCZs showed a reduced p-MMN and d-MMN amplitudes, compared with HCs.PANSS Positive dimension (u03b2=-.421, p<.001) and p-MMN amplitude (u03b2=-.219, p<.011) were found to predict SLOF work skills domain of SCZs, independently from symptoms, demographic characteristics and neurocognition. Conclusions. The impairment in the pre-attentive processing in SCZs might represent a candidate biomarker of poor functional outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0400.021
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0100.025
Open science0.0060.007
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it