A TWIN INTERVIEW WITH DR B. ANDERSEN AND DR G. GOLDZWEIG BY THE JCR EDITORS IN CHIEF AWARDED TWO JCR BOARD MEMBERS BY INTERNATIONAL PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY SOCIETY (IPOS): BARBARA ANDERSEN (USA), WINNER 2023 ARTHUR M. SUTHERLAND AWARD AND MEMORIAL LECTURE; GIL GOLDZWEIG (ISRAEL), WINNER 2023 NOEMI FISMAN AWARD FOR LIFETIME CLINICAL EXCELLENCE.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In advance of the 24th Annual World Congress of Psychosocial Oncology and Psychosocial Academy, held in Milan, Italy from August 31st to September 3rd, 2023, the International Psycho-Oncology Society (IPOS) has announced the winners of the 2023 IPOS Awards. The Journal of Cancer Rehabilitation is proud to announce that two of our very own Editorial Board Members, Dr. Barbara Andersen and Dr. Gil Goldzweig, have been honored as recipients of this year’s IPOS awards. Specifically, Dr. Barbara Andersen has been selected as the winner of the 2023 Arthur M. Sutherland Lifetime Achievement Award and will be honored by being invited to give the Memorial Lecture at the IPOS World Congress. , while Dr. Gil Goldzweig has been selected as the winner of the 2023 Noemi Fisman Award for Lifetime Clinical Excellence. This twin interview is dedicated to both esteemed colleagues and Journal of Cancer Rehabilitation board members.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".