MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Impact of Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation Monitoring on Elderly Patientswith Hypertension and Debilitation Undergoing LaparoscopicRadical Resection of Gastrointestinal Tumors

2024· article· en· W6947740433 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)Postoperative cognitive dysfunctionVasoactiveBlood pressureCognitive impairmentOxygen saturationResectionPostoperative pain

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To investigate the effects of regional cerebral oxygen saturation(rSO2) monitoring and target-oriented management on early cognitive function,inflammatory factors and oxidative stress in elderly patients with hypertension and asthenia after laparoscopic radical resection of gastrointestinal tumors. Methods A total of 80 elderly patients with hypertension and asthenia who planned to undergo laparoscopic radical resection of gastrointestinal tumors under elective general anesthesia and were treated in the People′s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from July 2022 to June 2023 were selected as the study objects,they were divided into 2 groups by random number table method,each group had 40 cases.The control group did not use rSO2 monitoring,while the study group received rSO2 monitoring.Before and after surgery,the scores of the mini-mental state examination(MMSE) and the montreal cognitive assessment(MoCA) were recorded to evaluate the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction(POCD).Serum levels of S100β,neuron specific enolase(NSE),interleukin-6(IL-6),tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α),C-reactive protein(CRP),superoxide dismutase(SOD) and malondialdehyde(MDA) were measured before and after surgery.The dosage of propofol,remifentanil,sufentanil and vasoactive drugs were recorded during the operation.Numerical rating scale(NRS) was used to evaluate the pain degree of the patients at 2 h,4 h,8 h and 12 h after surgery. Results After one day of surgery,the study group exhibited significantly lower MMSE and MoCA scores compared to their preoperative scores,as well as lower scores than the control group during the same period(P<0.05).Additionally,the incidence of POCD in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group after one day of surgery(P<0.05).Furthermore,postoperative serum levels of S100β,NSE,IL-6,TNF-α,CRP and MDA were higher in both groups compared to preoperative levels(P<0.05),but these levels were significantly lower in the study group compared to the control group(P<0.05).The SOD levels decreased after one day of surgery in both groups(P<0.05),but remained higher in the study group compared to the control group(P<0.05).Moreover,intraoperatively,propofol and remifentanil consumption was significantly lower in the study group compared to the control group(P<0.05),while there was no significant difference in sufentanil dosage between both groups(P>0.05).The utilization rate of vasoactive drugs was also significantly lower in the study group compared to controls(P<0.05).However,there were no significant differences observed between both groups regarding NRS score at each time point after surgery(P>0.05). Conclusion Monitoring changes in rSO2 and implementing goal-directed management during laparoscopic radical resection of gastrointestinal tumors has a protective effect on early postoperative cognitive function in elderly patients with hypertension and frailty,effectively reducing the secretion of inflammatory factors,oxidative stress response,and risk of POCD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.194
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change→French-language works237,207→