MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6948133691 · doi:10.48448/dh8v-6687

3-C-357 - RNA binding of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 is dysregulated in a mouse model of Multiple Sclerosis

2021· other· en· W6948133691 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUnderline Science Inc. · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell Image Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiple sclerosisRibonucleoproteinRNA-binding proteinRNATranscriptomeNeurodegenerationExperimental autoimmune encephalomyelitisHeterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Authors: Patricia Thibault¹, Hannah Salapa¹, Michael Levin¹ ¹University of Saskatchewan Abstract: Neurodegeneration (NDG), hallmarked by neuronal cell body and axonal loss, occurs in progressive Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in the absence of overt relapses and inflammatory episodes. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 (A1) is an RNA binding protein that is key in cellular RNA metabolism, but is mislocalized from nuclei to cytoplasm in the neurons from brains of people with progressive MS, and from spinal cords of mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a model for MS. We hypothesized that this mislocalization impacts the A1 RNA binding profile to promote NDG. To test this, we compared the A1 RNA binding profile from the spinal cords of naïve mice to those of mice with EAE, using crosslinking-immunoprecipitation/RNA sequencing (CLIPseq). We confirmed that the global RNA transcriptome from EAE mouse spinal cords is distinct from that of naïve mice, and further found that severity of EAE disease resulted in a greater alteration in the global transcriptome, with a number of differentially-expressed genes involved in neurodegeneration. We have also generated a first-of-its-kind profile of homeostatic A1 RNA targets in spinal cord. Further, the A1 RNA binding profile is drastically dysregulated in EAE mouse spinal cords, losing interaction with ~40% of homeostatically bound RNAs and instead enriching for non-coding RNAs. We are in the process of mapping the A1 binding "footprint" on these RNAs to provide insight into its specificity. Together, these data will form the foundation of our understanding of the role A1 dysfunction plays in NDG in MS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUnderline Science Inc.Same topicCell Image Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207