WORKSHOP Análise do ciclo de vida e soluções sustentáveis no melhoramento de terrenos: e-book Apresentações
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A Comissão Portuguesa de Melhoramento de Terrenos (CPMT), com o apoio da Sociedade Portuguesa de Geotecnia (SPG), da Ordem dos Engenheiros (OE) e do Departamento de Engenharia Civil da Universidade de Coimbra promoveram o Workshop “Análise do Ciclo de Vida e Soluções sustentáveis no Melhoramento de Terrenos” o qual decorreu no Auditório Laginha Serafim do Departamento de Engenharia Civil da Universidade de Coimbra, no dia 10 de novembro de 2023.O workshop foi dedicado à apresentação de casos práticos e software relacionados com a Análise do Ciclo de Vida em obras geotécnicas, complementado com a apresentação de algumas soluções sustentáveis aplicadas ao melhoramento de terrenos. O e-book reproduz as palestras proferidas por conferencistas de reconhecido mérito, da academia e de empresas que operam no sector. Destaque é dado à apresentação de softwares de apoio à Análise do Ciclo de Vida em obras geotécnicas, One Click LCA® e Calculadora de Carbono da EFFC/DFI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.052 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".