MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6948574893 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10167102

Mocyta fungi

2023· article· en· W6948574893 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant and Fungal Interactions Research
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwampPlant litterVegetation (pathology)AlderMarshBalsamRubus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

101. Mocyta fungi (Gravenhorst) † (Illustrations in Klimaszewski et al. 2015b, 2018), Table 1 References. Gravenhorst 1806. Casey 1893, 1910. Bernhauer 1907. Muona 1984. Gusarov 2003. Klimaszewski et al. 2018, 2020, 2021. Distribution. Palearctic, adventive in North America, recorded from A/S (Klimaszewski et al. 2021). Canada: AB, BC, LB, MB, NB, NF, NS, NU, ON, PE, QC, SK, YT. USA: AK, CA, ME, MA, MN, NH, NY, OR, RI, WA. Collection and Habitat data. In NH this species was most abundant in an old-growth silver maple floodplain forest, where specimens were commonly taken by sifting old river drift and by capture with a flight intercept trap. They were also taken from grass litter, by sifting litter by a stream, in forest litter, grass sod, and on the side of a water tower. Collected from May to October. In AK found at forest edge with Populus tremuloides Michx. and Rubus idaeus L. 1753; in area of Spirea and dwarf birch; Salix leaf litter; clear-cuts; creekside/ocean beach confluence, under boards and driftwood; and under rocks (Klimaszewski et al. 2021). In Canada (NB) found in forested wet areas such as silver maple swamps in leaf litter, in leaf litter in eastern white cedar swamps and forests, under alders in leaf litter and moss in a marsh, treading vegetation in boggy marsh and a cattail marsh, and in pitfall traps in a red spruce forest (Klimaszewski et al. 2021). In NF taken from pitfall traps in cut and burned balsam fir, birch, spruce-poplar and riparian forests, in agricultural fields, and among vegetation on coastal sand dunes. In QC found in mixed forests and yellow birch forests (Klimaszewski et al. 2011, 2021). Material. USA, New Hampshire, Coos Co.: 3 mi E Stewartstown, 23.V.1982, D.S. Chandler, sift leaf litter along river edge, 1 female. Pinkham Notch, 1.VII.1982, sift grass litter, D.S. Chandler, 1 female. White Mts., Glen Ellis Falls, 1900’, 15.VIII.1976, J.M. and B.A. Campbell (CNC), 1 female. Grafton Co.: Bedell Bridge St. Park @ Oliverian Brook, 7.VI.1992, 8 females; 14.VII.1992, 16 females; 2.VIII.1992, 7 females; 26.VIII.1992, 8 females; 8.IX.1992, 3 females; 21.X.1991, 1 female, berlese old river drift, D.S. Chandler; 2.X.1991, sift litter by stream, D.S. Chandler, 2 females; 7–24.V.1992, 25.V–7.VI.1992, 3–19.VIII.1992, 30.IX–21.X.1991, D.S. Chandler, FITrap, 4 females. Bedell Bridge St. Park @ Oliverian Brook, Haverhill, 2.X.1991, S.T. O’Keefe, sift forest litter, 3 females. Rockingham Co.: Seabrook backdunes, 18.V.1989, D.S. Chandler, sift forest litter, 1 female. Strafford Co.: UNH Dudley Lot, 1 km W[E] Lee, 11.IX.2008, G.O. Pena, berlese grass sod, 1 female. Durham Foss Farm Rd, 15.X.1981, W.J. Morse, water tower, 1 female. Comments. Morphologically this species is one of the most variable Mocyta species. Most adults have the elytra slightly longer than the pronotum, but some have the elytra as long as the pronotum along the midline. The spermathecal stem is also variable in shape. Only females have been found in the Nearctic Region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1170.067

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPlant and Fungal Interactions ResearchFrench-language works237,207