MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6948616579 · doi:10.5167/uzh-212883

Microslides

2021· book-chapter· en· W6948616579 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · 2021
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWindow (computing)MountSample (material)Falling (accident)Fish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2.9.1 Microslides Microslides are relatively easy to store and may be kept at room temperature under normal conditions. Slides should be handled gently, kept in the dark and at cool temperatures, and stored on stable shelving, especially in the case of large and heavy slide collections (Carter and Walker 1999). Permanent mounts are best prepared with resin-based products, such as Canada balsam and Euparal for botanical and mycological specimens, (Carter and Walker 1999) and epoxy resins for fossils. As slide mounts will always remain fluid to some extent, they should be stored flat with the mount on the upper side. Slotted slide boxes, for instance, should be stored upright like books on a shelf and marked in a way that indicates how to open the box correctly, to prevent slides from falling out and breaking. Microslides may be stored together with the main collection or separately with other microslides. Fossil microslides In fossils, the size of the microslide should correspond to the nature of the fossil, whether it be a longitudinal or tangential cut or a cross section, a small or large fossil, or a cross-drilling sample from a large fossil (e.g. Chinsamy and Raath 1992, Stein and Sander 2009). Commonly used microscope slides for fossils, also referred to as palaeohistological slides, come in different sizes: common formats are 2.5 × 5 cm, 5 × 5 cm, 7.5 x 5 cm. Unusual formats may include anything up to self-cut window panes measuring tens of centimetres in length and width. Palaeohistological slides are usually thicker than standard microscopy slides used in biology labs. They can be up to several millimetres thick, partly to withstand strains on the slide that might occur during the preparation of the fossilised samples. Due to the wide range of sizes and thicknesses, palaeohistological slides are stored in a variety of different slide boxes. Labels for microslides Care must be taken with slide labels. Some commercially available slide labels are unsuitable for permanent preparations because of the poor quality of the paper or glue. If a self-adhesive label is used, ensure that it is of archival quality (with acid-free adhesives) (Carter and Walker 1999). Recommendations à standardise storage types if possible à use resin-based mounting for long-term storage, i.e. Canada balsam and Euparal in botanical and mycological preparations, and epoxy resins infossil preparations Examples to see one of the largest collections of palaeohistological slides in Switzerland, visit the PIM in Zürich to see preserved microscopic algae (diatoms) on microslides and stored in histologic preparation boxes, see the MHNG in Geneva for taxonomic studies, the type specimens represented in the cryptogamic collection of the CJBG in Geneva have been removed from the general collection and stored in separate fire-proof metal cabinets (Clerc et al. 2017) Supplier storage boxes can be bought from a broad range of histology lab suppliers like Carl Roth Laborbedarf (Arlesheim CH, www.carlroth.com/ch) Further reading for an extensive overview of storing, managing, and digitizing slide collections see Neuhaus et al. (2017)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)Same topicPlant and animal studiesFrench-language works237,207