Bibliographic record
Abstract
REDISCOVERY OF CARDIOPHORUS ROBUSTUS LECONTE, 1853 Recently, 3 specimens of C. robustus have been discovered from Maine, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island. All records are voucheridentified specimens originally posted by participants of the Bug-Guide website. Specimens have label data as follows: “ME: York Co., Kennebunk-Parson’s Beach, 23-III-2012, B. Woo (BG622804)” [BAMC], approximate locality 43.3420°N, 70.5200°W; “MA: Middle-sex Co., Shirley, 6-V-2012, T. Murray (BG638283),” approximate locality 42.5400°N, 71.6500°W [BAMC]; “ USA: RI, Washington County, Block Island, sandy path along coastal bluff, A. Hunt,” approximate locality 41.2070°N, 71.5580°W. These new records suggest that this species did not become extinct as suspected. The conservation status of this species remains unknown. REMARKS Finding a new species of Cardiophorus with no morphological affinities to other North American species was surprising given that Douglas (2003) examined over 6,000 specimens from the region. The present find suggests that further collecting is needed in other ecosystems within the eastern USA. It is encouraging to recognize that C. robustus continues to persist in rare sandy habitats in highly populated northeastern USA. This suggests that habitat conservation measures have had a positive effect on this species. However, it is unknown whether sufficient habitat exists for long-term survival of C. carinatus and C. robustus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".