Oxypoda pseudolacustris Klimaszewski
Bibliographic record
Abstract
230. Oxypoda pseudolacustris Klimaszewski (Illustrations in Klimaszewski et al. 2006, 2018), Table 1 References. Klimaszewski et al. 2006, 2011, 2015 a, 2018. Distribution. Nearctic. Canada: AB, MB, NB, NF, NS, ON, QC, SK. USA: ME (NSR), NH. Collection and Habitat data. In ME found in leaf litter in wet depressions in a forest; in NH taken from leaf litter, leaf litter along stream, leaf litter by spring, birch-fir litter, alder litter, conifer leaf litter, spruce-fir leaf litter, and in rotten wood. Collected from May to October. In Canada recorded from various forests such as mixed forests, mature hardwood forests, red maple forests and swamps, eastern white cedar swamps, fir forests (old-growth and 50-year-old plantations), forested black spruce bogs; and open habitats such as agricultural fields, meadow with Salix shrubs, and litter from lake and river margins. Adults were taken in Sphagnum moss, moss and litter near vernal ponds in forests, Sphagnum in mist zone of waterfall, leaf litter, litter in alpine and subalpine habitats, drift material along lake and river margins, and from lining of deserted beaver lodge (Klimaszewski et al. 2006, 2011, 2018). Material. USA, Maine, Penobscot Co.: 4 mi W Orono, 28.V.1982, D.S. Chandler, sift leaf litter in wet depressions in forest, 1 female. New Hampshire, Carroll Co.: Sandwich Notch, 15.VIII.1980, D.S. Chandler, sift leaf litter, 1 female, 1 sex? Coos Co.: Mt. Washington, Halfway House, 25.VI.1982, sift birch-fir litter, 8 males, 6 females; 18.VI.1982, D.S. Chandler, sift birch & fir litter, 3 males, 4 females. Mt. Washington, Auto Road, 2700’, 18.VI.1982, D.S. Chandler, sift leaf litter along stream, 3 males, 2 females; 25.VI.1982, sift rotten wood, 1 female; 1.VII.1982, D.S. Chandler, sift birch litter, 4 males; 3000’, 1.VII.1982, sift leaf litter by spring, 1 male, 2 females, 1 sex?; 25.VI.1982, D.S. Chandler, sift litter by stream, 1 male, 1 female. Norton Pool, 2 mi E East Inlet Dam, 7.IX.1984, D.S. Chandler, sift spruce-fir leaf litter, 1 male. Norton Pool, 3 mi NE East Inlet Dam, 9.V.1986, sift conifer leaf litter, 2 males; 7.IX.1984, D.S. Chandler, sift alder litter, 1 male. 1 mi NE East Inlet Dam, 17.X.1986, D.S. Chandler, sift conifer leaf litter, 1 male. Beaver Brook Falls, 3 mi NE Colebrook, 27.IX.1986, D.S. Chandler, 1 male, 1 female. Strafford Co.: 4 mi SW Durham, 4.V.1969, R.L. Blickle, pitfall, 1 female.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.200 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".