Bibliographic record
Abstract
-- Documentation --Name: Josef BlohutmusiXplora-ID: b2920musiXplora-URI: https://musixplora.de/mxp/b2920Gender: mDate of Birth: 1880Place of Birth: UndefinedDate of Death: 1938Place of Death: LeipzigFirst Mentioned: 1907Last Mentioned: 1930Sectors: InstrumentenbauProfessions (Historical): NotenrollenherstellerProfessions (Musical): Instrumentenbauer, MusikalienhändlerProfessions (Non-Musical): UnternehmerMain Place of Activity: LeipzigArbeitsumfeld: GroupRoleNamemXp-IDKollegInnenKollegeEduard August Hugo Meißnerm2356Persönlicher Umkreis: GroupRoleNamemXp-IDNetzwerkNetzwerkpartnerEugen d'Alberta0808Institutionen: RoleTitlemXp-IDRelatedBlohut, Meißner & Co.3030175Titel/Medien: RoleSigelTitlemXp-IDRelatedMatzke 2016Die Anfänge des Musikinstrumentenmuseums in Leipzig. Paul de Wits Gästebuch 1893 bis 19055002009RelatedHSM 2009Dier Hersteller von selbst spielenden Musikinstrumenten aus Leipzig von 1876 bis 1930. Datenbank. Gemeinschaftsprojekt des Museums für Musikinstrumente der Universität Leipzig mit der Gesellschaft für Selbstspielende Musikinstrumente5002026RelatedHeise 2018aLeipzig als Zentrum des Musikautomatenbaus von 1880 bis 19305002052RelatedGästebuch 1893Das Gästebuch von Paul de Wit. Mit autographen Eintragungen der Besucher des Musikhistorisches Museums Paul de Wit in Leipzig. von der Eröffnung im Jahr 1893 bis zur Schließung im Jahr 1905. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript5020488Changelog: - v0.0.1: Initial Upload.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.804 | 0.804 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".