MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6948925548 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14680810

The Novel in English as Paradigm of Canadian Literary Identity: From Frances Brooke to Sara Jeannette Duncan

2013· article· en· W6948925548 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShort Stories in Global Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnic groupLiterary criticismIdentity (music)Literary scienceMainstreamHistory of literatureLiterary theoryLiterary genre

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book focuses on the novel in English as paradigm of Canadian literary identity as means to challenge its monolithic construction by bringing into light the contributions of early female and ethnic authors to the genre which have frequently been either dismissed or undervalued as relevant literary agents. With that aim, the present research covers the period from the publication of Canada’s first novel in English, The History of Emily Montague by Frances Brooke in 1769 to 1904 when Sara Jeannette Duncan’s The Imperialist saw the light, that is, from the first steps of the genre to Canada’s first modernist novel. Part I deals with the general theoretical framework that has Historicist, Feminist and Ethnic literary approaches as axis. They raise the crucial role of the historization of literature in the establishment of literary traditions and identities and foster the rethinking of historical discourses insofar they have promoted the founding, support and perpetuation of certain assumptions which have affected female and ethnic literary production and consideration. Part II concentrates on English Canadian literary history, tradition and identity. By focusing on the novel genre, the anthologization of English Canadian literature is approached in a detailed study about the presence/absence in mainstream anthologies from 1920 to 2004 of the alternating voices of women and ethnic novelists. In order to voice them, attention is paid to ethnic and feminist critical contributions since they question established axioms of Canada's literary history, tradition and identity and offer access to women and ethnic authors’ writing so that their diverse senses of identity, otherwise silenced, are voiced. These different senses of identity are precisely the focus of Part III. From 1769 to 1904, there is a first frequently disregarded novel by a woman, Frances Brooke; almost totally dismissed novels by acclaimed authors as Susanna (Strickland) Moodie; female authors who succeeded in juvenile fiction such as Agnes Maule Machar, Margaret Murray Robertson and Margaret Marshall Saunders; early ethnic contributions to the novel genre as those by the Black male author Martin Robinson Delany and the English Chinese Canadian woman writer Winnifred Eaton; and successful women novelists as May Agnes Early Fleming, Lily Dougall, Susan Frances Harrison and Sara Jeannette Duncan. By unsilencing them and bringing into light their significance, this dissertation demonstrates that early Canadian English literature is riddled with successful, intelligent and powerful female and ethnic authors whose contributions need to be re-considered if generally accepted ideas on the non-patriarchal and multicultural character of Canadian letters is to be claimed. These novels by a temporary Black resident in Canada, an English Asian Canadian woman, and plenty of English immigrant and Canadian-born females demonstrate that Canada’s early literary heritage is solid and shaped by diversity but also bring into question that it is still to be re-covered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.675

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0280.020
Scholarly communication0.0120.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicShort Stories in Global LiteratureFrench-language works237,207