Agonopterix conterminella Depressariidae
Bibliographic record
Abstract
17. Agonopterix conterminella (Zeller, 1839) (Depressariidae) Depressaria conterminella Zeller, 1839: 196. Type locality: [Germany], Augsburg. BOLD:AAE7213 Palearctic distribution. Europe to Japan. New North American records. Canada: British Columbia, Mount Revelstoke National Park, 26 Jul 2005, 1 ♀ (CNC); Sheridan Lake, 29 Jul 2006, 1 ♂ (CNC); Ontario, Thunder Bay area, 24 Jul 1981, 1 ♀ (CNC). Diagnosis. North American specimens have brownish grey forewings with a discal black chevron-like mark and a distally adjacent dirty white spot. They are very similar both in maculation and genitalia to the Nearctic gelidella (Busck), which is also reported to feed primarily on willow (Hodges 1974). The similarity in pattern between the two was noted by Clarke (1941). The male genitalia of both species has the digitiform process of the sacculus straight, relatively thick, apically rounded and extended to about three-quarters the height of the valva, and the cucullus of the valva is broadly rounded; differences between the two species appear subtle and have not been studied. In the female genitalia of conterminella, the signum is near the posterior third of the corpus bursae or near the constriction of the ductus bursae, whereas in gelidella it is in the anterior third of the corpus bursae; as in male genitalia, differences are subtle and have not been studied in relation to individual variation. The two species are more than 5% barcode divergent. Larval host. Willows (Salix spp., Salicaceae). Note. The three North American records were collected in relatively remote locations and probably indicate that the species is native, hence Holarctic in distribution. The very close similarity in morphology with the North American gelidella means that the two species would be very difficult to distinguish without the help of barcodes, and there could be unrecognized specimens of conterminella among gelidella material in collections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".