MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6948998715 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10406262

Scipopus (Phaeopterina) turgidus Lindsay & Marshall 2023, sp. nov.

2023· article· en· W6948998715 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaHolotypeRothschildChaetotaxyMeristics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scipopus (Phaeopterina) turgidus sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 87933FA3-C177-4A64-89C4-4329C51FE3A9 Fig. 69 Differential diagnosis Scipopus (Phaeopterina) turgidus sp. nov. resembles S. (Ph.) noturgidus sp. nov. in having dark brown tarsi, uniformly brown infuscate wings and a wide epicephalon, but differs by the presence of the postocellar seta, the strongly convex posterior cervical sclerite, the swollen T2, and the anteriorly setulose postpronotal lobe. Etymology The species name, from the Latin adjective for ‘swollen’, refers to both the swollen posterior female cervical sclerite and the swollen anterior margin of T2. Type material examined Holotype COLOMBIA • 1 ♀; Amazonas, PNN Amacayacu San Martin; 3°46′ S, 70°18′ W; 150 m a.s.l.; 2–16 Apr. 2001; D. Chota leg.; Malaise; M. 1612; debu01089020/MYCRO605-19 unsuccessfully sequenced for CO1; IAVH. Paratypes COLOMBIA • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; debu01089397/MYCRO824-20 sequenced for CO1–5′; IAVH • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; Malaise; M. 1613; debu01089396/ MYCRO821-20 sequenced for CO1–5′; IAVH (dissected and photographed, Fig. 69A–D). Description LENGTH. 12–13 mm. HEAD. Palpus orange, light brown basally, pale microtrichose and black setulose, narrow (length 4.5× height). Clypeus orange, width ~2.5 × height, silvery microtrichose on entire surface. Frontal vitta dull, orange, microtrichose. Epicephalon mostly orange, sometimes brown medially, shiny, bare, wide (width ⅔ or more of upper frontal vitta width at inner verticals), clearly delineated from upper frontal vitta. Upper fronto-orbital seta absent or present; one lower fronto-orbital seta absent, all other head chaetotaxy well-developed. THORAX. Scutum black-brown, brown microtrichose, with a wide, indistinct silvery-blue median sheen. Female cervical sclerite strongly convex on posterior half. Postpronotal lobe black-brown, densely setulose on anterior point. Notopleuron black-brown, indistinct pale microtrichosity surrounding anterior notopleural seta and ventral margin. Thorax black-brown with blue sheen, entirely silvery microtrichose. Legs dark brown; first fore and hind tarsomere dark brown with ventral golden fringe. Wing brown infuscate. FEMALE ABDOMEN. T1 with fine, long, white setae. Pleuron pale grey, faded in available specimens, but apparently darker on dorsal margin of P2–5. T1+2 ~1.5× length of T3; anterior margin of T2 swollen, posterior margin of T2 ~1.9 × as wide as T1. Oviscape dark brown, black setulose, white microtrichose on anterior ⅔, ~2.5× length of T6. Paired and single spermathecal ducts arising separately from bursa copulatrix. Paired spermathecal duct short (5.0 × length of typical paired spermathecae), narrow basally, wide distally. Paired spermathecal stems and paired spermathecae apparently absent. Single spermathecal duct narrow, equal in length and diameter to paired duct at base, with apical swollen bulb. Single spermatheca large, elongate, with numerous jagged tubercles and an apical indentation. MALE ABDOMEN. Not observed. Remarks All three females available for examination were dissected and apparently lacked paired spermathecae, which may have been lost during dissection. However, the distal end of the paired duct is present and blunt on all three specimens and there seems to be no evidence of snapped off stems, suggesting a loss of the paired (primary) spermathecae in this species. Distribution Colombia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207