Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ceratostomella cuspidata (Fr.) Réblová, Mycologia 98: 77. 2006. Sphaeria cuspidata Fr., Syst. Mycol. 2: 220. 1823. Basionym. ≡ Ceratostoma cuspidatum (Fr.) Sacc., Syll. Fung. 1: 474. 1882. Description. See Réblová (2006). Specimens examined. Belgium • Locality and date unknown; B. Declerque (IFBL 57.31, culture no longer viable). New Zealand • West Coast Region, Westland District, Mount Aspiring National Park, Makarora Bush Walk, 500 m N of NP Headquarters in Makarora; decaying wood of Nothofagus sp.; 30 Mar 2005; M. Réblová M. R. 2964 / NZ 629 (PDD 123700, culture ICMP 17629). Habitat and geographical distribution. Saprobe on decaying wood of Nothofagus sp., Quercus sp., and other unidentified hosts, known in the Czech Republic, New Zealand, Norway and Sweden (Fries 1823; Réblová 2006; MyCoPortal). According to GlobalFungi, C. cuspidata is distributed in temperate and subtropical regions in both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. Identical sequences were found in 28 samples isolated from air and soil in forest and anthropogenic habitats, and occasionally in croplands, grasslands, and shrublands biomes in Australia, Indonesia and New Zealand. The environmental data suggest that C. cuspidata is especially widespread in Australasia. Notes. In our phylogeny, the species is represented by two isolates from Belgium and New Zealand. Ceratostomella cuspidata is well distinguishable from other species by its suballantoid to reniform ascospores, often flattened on one side, measuring 4–5 × 2–3 µm (Réblová 2006). The ascospores are arranged in a fascicle or they are 2–3 - seriate in the sporiferous part of the ascus. Ceratostomella rostrata closely resembles C. cuspidata but stands out due to its larger ascomata and narrower allantoid to suballantoid ascospores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".