MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6949214812 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15218758

Thereva brunnea Cole 1923

2025· article· en· W6949214812 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsRoyal British Columbia Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMountWest coastEast coastGlacierHistorical record

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thereva brunnea Cole (Fig. 12) Specimens examined (15). BC: Cathedral Provincial Park, Glacier Lake; Cathedral Provincial Park, Quinescoe Mountain summit; Hope, Nicolum River; Manning Provincial Park, Strawberry Flats; Nicola; Saanich, Mount Newton; Victoria, Ten Mile Point; Wellington. DEBU, RBCM, SEM. Database and literature records (44+4). BC: Agassiz; Chase; Courtenay; Cultus Lake Provincial Park; Dean River; Gabriola Island; Gillies Bay; Hornby Island, Norman Point; Merritt, Midday Valley; Mesachie Lake; Mission; Nanaimo; Quadra Island; Vancouver; Vancouver, University of BC; Victoria (type locality); Wellington. CASC, CNCI, EMEC, INHS, MCZC, MEI, NHMW, OSUC, OSUO, SEM. iNaturalist records (1). Tipella, Harrison Lake, north end (iNat 53228675) (Fig. 12). Conservation status. BC: S4 Distributional notes. In British Columbia, T. brunnea is widespread in coastal areas (Victoria, Vancouver, Dean River) and the southwestern Interior (Chase, Merritt). It is especially frequent on the south coast and likely occurs east to the Rocky Mountains based on records in adjacent jurisdictions (Holston & Irwin 2005). Ecoprovinces and other designations. BC: Coast and Mountains, Georgia Depression, Southern Interior, Southern Interior Mountains. Range. Cordilleran. British Columbia and Alberta south to Montana and California (Webb et al. 2013). Biological notes. Flight period: 4 May–6 September. Thereva brunnea is found from sea beaches to alpine meadows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0810.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicDiatoms and Algae Research→French-language works237,207→