Bibliographic record
Abstract
215 Euura histrio group We recognize 16 species of the histrio group in the West Palaearctic, only one of which (E. elbrus, if it is a valid species) may be absent in Fennoscandia. Based on our sequencing data, there could be one or two additional species in the West Palaearctic, but also one or two additional synonyms. The few potentially additional species cannot be morphologically clearly distinguished from E. striata, E. tenuis and / or E. septentrionalis. Neither are they genetically so distinct that separate species status is unambiguously indicated. If the one or two additional lineages are not distinct species, it is unclear under which species these should be classified. One of the lineages is perhaps not E. septentrionalis (which is on Betula), because many of the specimens have been reared from Salix. Euura amicula, E. hartigi, E. histrio, E. nigrina, E. nuorbinjargi, E. propinquator, E. rufa, E. schlueteri, E. stenogaster, and E. histriato Prous, Liston & Mutanen sp. nov. can be relatively well defined based on colouration, valvula 3 and / or lancets. These species are also well supported or at least not contradicted by nuclear data (no genetic data for E. nigrina) and often also based on host plants. Males of most species are more difficult to recognize than females, and we have largely relied on nuclear data to associate them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".