FIGURE 3. Dorid nudibranch sea slug Ancula lentiginosa Farmer 1964 in Myopedicellina, a replacement name for Myosoma Robertson (Entoprocta: Pedicellinidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
FIGURE 3. Dorid nudibranch sea slug Ancula lentiginosa Farmer 1964 and its white egg masses and entoproct prey, Myopedicellina spinosa, (Robertson, 1900) n. comb., in situ, low rocky intertidal, Tarantula Reef, Jalama Beach, 34.4949°, -120.4970°, Santa Barbara Co., CA, USA, photographed 7 July 2016. Photo courtesy of Jeff Goddard, Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara. The nudibranch slug was only 4 mm long, but it looks like a giant in this "micro-forest" growing on the underside of a low intertidal cobble at Jalama. Myopedicellina spinosa are the translucent, wine-glass-shaped zooids bent over (probably in defensive posture) on their relatively thick and flexible stalks and visible underneath the slug and in the foreground. The skinny, semi-opaque white tubes at lower left appear to be zooids of a cyclostome bryozoan. The fuzzylooking stalks across the top and in front of the slug are colonial hydrozoans covered with translucent, branching colonial ciliates and a few brown benthic diatoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.090 | 0.030 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".