Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spilogona wrangeli Hennig, 1959 Figs 6 E, F Spilogona wrangeli Hennig, 1959: 360. Type-locality: “O-w Wrangelja, werch. r. Klen k SSW ot pika Berri, 19.–21.VIII. 38 g. Gekker” [RUSSIA, Far East, Wrangelya I., upper Klen river SSW of Mt. Berry] [seen]. Spilogona coactilis Huckett, 1965: 214. Type-locality: “ Herschel Island, Yukon Territory, 7.11.53 [i.e. 11.vii.1953], J.S. Waterhouse)” [CANADA, Yukon] [seen]. Syn. nov. Spilogona malaisei (Ringdahl, 1920); Sorokina & Khruleva 2012: 556 (Wrangel Island). Misidentification. Spilogona wrangeli Hennig, 1959; Sorokina & Thidrikh, 2021: 229 (Wrangel Island). Notes. The holotypes of Spilogona coactilis (in Canadian National Collection) and Spilogona wrangeli (in ZISP) were examined. Both species had been described from arctic Islands, Wrangel Island and Herschel Island, and had not since been found in other localities. Spilogona coactilis is known only from the holotype and one additional male. A series of Spilogona wrangeli has been found recently on Wrangel Island (Sorokina & Thidrikh, 2021). The descriptions and the male terminalia are the same for both species. The exception was a v seta on the mid tibia, which Huckett described for Spilogona coactilis; Spilogona wrangeli is without a v seta on the mid tibia. I examined the holotype of Spilogona coactilis. The specimen is a little crumpled, legs pressed against the thorax, one mid tibia in glue; with difficulty I was able to see that the mid tibia is in fact without v setae. Males of these species are small in size (3.5–4 mm), facial edge often a little projecting beyond level of profrons, but sometimes not, subovate abdomen, blackish thorax without stripes, anepisternum without interspatial setae, scutellum with downwardly-directed preapical setulae on upper border of declivities, costa with spinules, mid tibia without v setae, hind femur with weak pv setae, and abdomen dark with indistinct black expansive marks. I therefore conclude that Spilogona coactilis Huckett, 1965 is a new junior synonym of Spilogona wrangeli Hennig, 1959. The female of both Spilogona coactilis and Spilogona wrangeli has been not described. It is very similar to Spilogona malaisei, like the male, and both can be separated as in following couplet: 1 Costa without spinules, with short setae............................................................ S. malaisei - Costa with spinules........................................................................... S. wrangeli Distribution. PALAEARCTIC: Russia (Wrangel Island). NEARCTIC: Yukon (Herschel Island). DNA barcode. BOLD BIN: BOLD:AED9512. See Table 1 for GenBank accession numbers. Remarks. Spilogona wrangeli is morphologically very similar to Spilogona malaisei, especially females. But based on DNA barcodes, these species are genetically different; the p-distance between them is 2.04–2.15%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".