Bibliographic record
Abstract
Himatolabus pubescens (Say) (Fig. 5–6) Diagnosis. Himatolabus pubescens can be recognized in general by its conspicuous pubescence that consists of abundant white and yellow setae. It can be distinguished from other species of Himatolabus by the pubescence that is irregularly distributed dorsally and by the lack of distinct postocular lobes. Description. Length 4.0– 6.8 mm. Integument reddish brown. Vestiture consisting of abundant, white to pale yellow setae; on elytra setae abundant, short, recumbent and curved. Head slightly narrowed from base to eyes; median carina slightly elevated, longitudinal, extending from vertex to middle of eye; surface of head strongly punctured below median carina. Rostrum shorter than head, constricted at antennal insertion; broadly expanded apically, about 2.0× width of frons; lateral apical angles with a blunt tooth. Antennae inserted dorsolaterally at basal 1/3 of rostrum. Pronotum width 1.3× length, widest at base; strongly arcuate laterally, converging to recurved apex; disc convex, with distinct, round impressions on median lateral area, surface with large, dense, moderately deep punctures. Elytra as long as wide, width at base 1.3–1.4× pronotal width; apex broadly rounded; striae shallowly impressed, inconspicuous, with moderately large and moderately deeply impressed punctures; interstriae rugose, weakly elevated, with scattered, fine punctures. Natural history. This species exhibits considerable variation over its range in terms of color, size and pubescence, and is the most widespread species of Himatolabus in North America (Hamilton 1992). Adults have been recorded on hazelnut (Corylus americana Walter), speckled alder (Alnus rugosa (DuRoi) Sprengel), gray alder (Alnus incana (Linnaeus) Moench), oak (Quercus spp.), and common yarrow (Achillea millefolium Linnaeus). However, it is most commonly associated with oak. The thief weevil, Pterocolis ovatus, is documented to be a nidus-kleptoparasite of H. pubescens when they use oak as their host plant (Hamilton 1992). Phenology. In Wisconsin, adults have been collected from May to July. Collection Methods. Twenty-five Wisconsin specimens were examined during this study from five counties. One specimen was swept from foliage in an oak-pine forest. Distribution. United States. AZ, CO, CT, IA, IL, IN, KS, KY, MA, ME, MI, MN, MO, NE, NJ, NH, NM, NY, OH, PA, RI, TN, TX, VA, VT, WI. Canada. MB, NS, PQ, ON. Wisconsin county records. This species has previously been recorded from Wisconsin (O’Brien and Wibmer 1982, Downie and Arnett 1996). Dane, Dodge, Door, Jackson, Polk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".