MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6949485013 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13737796

common-workflow-language/cwltool: 3.1.20240909164951

2024· other· en· W6949485013 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueEdinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsSummit Pacific College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoop (graph theory)Python (programming language)Black boxCompatibility (geochemistry)Conformance testing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

What's Changed cwl v1.3.0-dev1 native loop support by @GlassOfWhiskey in https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool/pull/1779 Start running the draft CWL v1.3.0 conformance tests by @mr-c in https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool/pull/2022 Conformance testing, skip a bad cwltest release by @mr-c in https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool/pull/2017 Added new loop test by @LanderOtto in https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool/pull/2006 removing duplicate "reference" by @danielskatz in https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool/pull/2030 Support array of integers and floats as command argument parameters by @tom-tan in https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool/pull/2037 Explicitly support Python 3.13; add to CI matrix by @mr-c in https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool/pul fix loadContents for File[] by @fmigneault in https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool/pull/2036 Deps Requires schema-salad >=8.7 for MapSchema validation by @tetron in https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool/pull/2024 skip pydot 3.x+ for now by @mr-c in https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool/pull/2020 Update pytest requirement from <8.3,>=6.2 to >=6.2,<8.4 by @dependabot in https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool/pull/2025 Bump mypy from 1.10.1 to 1.11.1 by @dependabot in https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool/pull/2028 Bump mypy from 1.11.1 to 1.11.2 by @dependabot in https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool/pull/2035 Update black requirement from ~=24.4 to ~=24.8 by @dependabot in https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool/pull/2029 Update flake8-bugbear requirement from <24.3 to <24.9 by @dependabot in https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool/pull/2032 l/2040 New Contributors @danielskatz made their first contribution in https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool/pull/2030 Full Changelog: https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool/compare/3.1.20240708091337...3.1.20240909164951

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0100.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2790.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh)French-language works237,207