Bibliographic record
Abstract
143 Euura lichtwardti (Konow, 1903) Figs 143, 380 Nematus apicalis Hartig, 1837: 201. Lectotype designated by Haris (1997). Synonymy by Lindqvist (1955). Primary homonym of Nematus apicalis Stephens, 1835 [Dineura stilata (Klug, 1816)]. Pachynematus lichtwardti Konow, 1903a: 379 (key). Lectotype designated below. Pachynematus kubesi Konow, 1905a: 154. Lectotype designated below. Synonymy by Lacourt (1999). Diagnosis Females are most similar to E. moerens. Metatarsomere 1 and metafemur are usually completely or nearly completely black in E. lichtwardti, but usually extensively pale (basal third of metatarsomere 1) in E. moerens. In males, tergum 8 has a distinct apical projection that distinguishes it clearly from E. moerens (absent or indistinct). The penis valves are also distinct from those in E. moerens and the other Euura. In males, sometimes terga 5–8 laterally and laterodorsally pale. Type material examined Lectotype Nematus apicalis GERMANY [according to the title of Hartig 1837] • ♀; ZSM, GBIF-GISHym3196. Lectotype Pachynematus lichtwardti, here designated CZECH REPUBLIC – Sudeten • ♀; Altvater; 50.08° N, 17.21° E; 12 Jun. 1900; B. Lichtwardt leg.; SDEI, GBIF-GISHym3872. Lectotype Pachynematus kubesi, here designated CZECH REPUBLIC – Central Bohemia • ♀; Kolin; 50.03° N, 15.20° E; A. Kubes leg.; SDEI, GBIFGISHym3873. Host plants Elytrigia repens (L.) Gould. (Kontuniemi 1965), Calamagrostis spp. (Kangas 1985; Macek et al. 2020). Genetics COI Based on 4 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 4.06% and the nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 4.26%, is Euura moerens. Nuclear Based on 2 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 0.06% (0.03% based on haplotypes of individual females). The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 1.47%, is Euura clitellata cluster 5. Based on 3 specimens of NaK (1654 bp), maximum within-species distance is 0.12% (also 0.12% when considering haplotypes of ZMUO.032405). Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".