Bibliographic record
Abstract
PTILOMYMAR Annecke & Doutt, 1961 (Figs 283–287) Ptilomymar Annecke & Doutt, 1961: 24. Type species: Ptilomymar rete Annecke & Doutt, 1961, by original designation. Diagnosis. Propodeum and gt 1 each with large vertical, translucent, reticulate lamina (Figs 286, 287a); propodeal seta large and branched with its base anterior to level of spiracle (Fig. 286). Remarks. Ptilomymar belongs to the Camptoptera group of genera. In the Neotropical region, Ptilomymar is unique in having 4-segmented tarsi. Tarsomere 4 is about 2× as long as tarsomere 3, indicating that tarsomere 4 consists of a fusion of tarsomeres 4 and 5. The scutellum with oval, obliquely-oriented campaniform sensilla is also unique. The peculiar translucent structures (“fins”) described above occur elsewhere only in Stephanocampta and some extralimital Camptoptera but in a different orientation, and the propodeal spiracle in those two genera is not branched. Specimens are almost always collected near water. We conjecture that their hosts are aquatic and adult females use their “fins” and branched propodeal spiracle to trap an air bubble before crawling down vegetation, thus giving them a source of air as they search underwater for host eggs. The absence of hind wing membrane at its junction with the venation apex is perhaps unique to the particular (unnamed) species illustrated; in other species there may be only a slight narrowing. Possibly, this narrowing allows for hind wing folding that may make it easier for the female to enter water. Neotropical hosts. Unknown. Distribution. No named species in the Neotropical region south of Mexico. Unidentified specimens examined (CNC, UCRC) are from at least 10 countries in Central and South America. Important reference. Huber et al. (2020).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".