Ostrya virginiana subsp. virginiana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
7a. Ostrya virginiana (Mill.) K.Koch subsp. virginiana Carpinus virginica Münchh., Der Hausvater 5 (1): 120 (Münchhausen 1770) orth. var. – O. carpinifolia var. virginica (Münchh.) Fliche, Bulletin de la Société botanique de France 35: 166 (Fliche 1888). – Note: Münchhausen misspelled the name given by Miller. Carpinus triflora Moench, Methodus: 694 (Moench 1794). – Type: not localized. – Note: the protologue does not state any locality, and Moench’s herbarium is destroyed (Stafleu & Cowan 1976 –1988). O. americana F.Michx., Histoire des Arbres Forestiers de l’Amérique Septentrionale 3 (1): 54 (Michaux 1812) nom. inval. – Associated material: A Canada ad Carolinam montosam, s. coll., s.n. (P06810885!). – Note: while Michaux briefly mentions an “ Ostrya americana ”, he apparently does not consider it to be a species different from “ Carpinus ostrya ” (Ostrya carpinifolia). The name is not mentioned in the index either, so the name is rather to be interpreted as meaning the plants from America. The associated material by Michaux also suggests that. O. virginica var. eglandulosa Spach, Annales des sciences naturelles, Botanique ser. 2 16: 246 (Spach 1841b). – Type: Cult. at Trianon Garden, 1833, s. coll., s.n. (lecto-, designated here: P06811525!). – Note: the specimen designated as lectotype here bears a note by Spach as author “Nob.” after the name. O. virginica var. glandulosa Spach, Annales des sciences naturelles, Botanique ser. 2 16: 246 (Spach 1841b). – O. virginiana var. glandulosa (Spach) Sarg., Botanical Gazette 67: 216 (Sargent 1919). – O. virginiana f. glandulosa (Spach) J.F.Macbr., Publications of the Field Museum of Natural History, botanical series 4 (7): 192 (MacBride 1929). – Type: Cult. at h. P. [hortus Parisiensis], 1833, s. coll., s.n. (lecto-, designated here: P06809319!). – Note: the specimen designated as lectotype here bears a note by Spach as author “Nob.” after the name. O. ostrya (L.) MacMill., The Metaspermae of the Minnesota Valley: 287 (MacMillan 1892) nom. inval. (tautonym), p.p. – Note: MacMillan referred only to the Virginian part of Linnaeus’ Carpinus ostrya L., but he produced a tautonym, which is not valid according to Art. 23.4 of the ICN (McNeill et al. 2012). O. virginiana var. lasia Fernald, Rhodora 38: 414 (Fernald 1936). – O. virginiana subsp. lasia (Fernald) A.E.Murray, Kalmia 12: 22 (Murray 1982). – Type: USA, Florida, Columbia Co., Lake City, 11–19 Jul. 1895, G.V. Nash 2158 (holo-: GH00033787!; iso-: E00870598!, K!, P06810598!, P06810607!, US 00089313!, WU!). – Additional type material: USA, Virginia, Henrico Co., Richmond, 5 May 1894, J.R. Churchill s.n. (para-: not localized); ibid., Princess Anne Co., rich dry woods, Little Neck, M.L. Fernald et al. 4627 (para-: not localized); ibid., Norfolk Co., dry rich woods, east of Gertie, M.L. Fernald et al. 4628 (para-: not localized).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".