Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nomada composita Mitchell, 1962: 408 (Connecticut holotype). Holotype. Female USA: Connecticut: Litchfield Co.: Colebrook (MCZ). Notes: Under-recorded due to identification difficulties, but S. Droege (pers. comm.) has recognized it from numerous sites across the region. However, material determined by him from New York and Canada proved on reexamination to pertain to two species one of which may be the morphospecies reported as Nomada sp. aff. composita Mitchell by Veit et al. (2022[“2021”]); see also Ascher et al. (2014) which differs in having an all red T 3 (lacking yellow lateral spots) and in having a wider prepygidial fimbria with yellower hairs (vs. narrower and more silvery in true N. composita) and subtle differences in spines at the apex of the hind femur. In Connecticut this species is best known from powerline ROW (Wagner et al. 2014a) where two voucher specimens confirmed to be true N. composita upon reexamination were found to vary in color, with one having small yellow sublateral spots on T 4 and some diffuse yellow on T 5 medially whereas the other had T 4- T 5 red.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.050 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".