Bibliographic record
Abstract
Liriomyza archboldi Frost (Figs. 31–34, 53) Liriomyza archboldi Frost, 1962: 51; Spencer 1983: 55; Spencer & Steigmaier 1973: 97; Spencer & Steyskal 1986; Spencer 1990: 317; Martinez & Étienne 2002: 34. Material examined. Costa Rica. Prov. San José. Moravia. Zurquí de Moravia, Tower path. 1600m. 1-7 JUN 2013. Proyecto ZADBI. Malaise trap #1, ZADBI-810. -84:00:57 10:02:58 #106920. INB0004449118 (1M: MNCR); same except 30 MAR-6 ABR 2013, ZADBI 647; #106495. INB0004424654 (1M: MNCR). Comments. The two specimens from Zurquí correspond to the original description of the species except for having both vti and vte on dark background (Fig. 31) (as opposed to vti on yellow and vte on black). The distinct pubescence of the first flagellomere of this species is characteristic (Fig. 31). The mention of this species in Spencer 1963 was a mistake and represents L. trifolii (Spencer & Stegmaier 1973). This species was overlooked in Spencer’s 1967 catalog. It is considered an uncommon species (Spencer 1983), and is so far known from the Bahamas, Florida and Costa Rica. In Costa Rica it was previously reported from low elevation, in San José (Spencer 1983). Its host plant (Bidens pilosa L.) is native to South America but is now cosmopolitan in distribution. It is considered an invasive weed and can grow in many different habitats and up to 3,200 m of elevation (GISD 2022). Host plant. Bidens pilosa L. (Asteraceae) (Spencer & Stegmaier 1973; Spencer 1990). Distribution. USA (Florida), Bahamas, Costa Rica (Fig. 53).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".