Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dinaraea angustula (Gyllenhal, 1810) Fig 47, Map 47 New Records. CANADA, New Brunswick, Albert Co., Shepody NWA, Germantown Section, 45.7056°N, 64.7642°W, 17.V.2004 (1 ♀, NBM). Carleton Co., Meduxnekeag River Valley Nature Preserve, 46.1965°N, 67.6340°W, 11.V.2005, M.- A. Giguère and R.P. Webster (1 ♀, RWC). Queens Co., Grand Lake, near Scotchtown, 45.8762°N, 66.1816°W, 30.IV.2006 (1 ♀, RWC). York Co., Charters Settlement, 45.8395°N, 66.7391°W, 22.VIII.2006, 17.IX.2006, 5.IX.2007, 23.IV.2008 (2 ♁, 2 ♀, RWC). Bionomic Notes. In Canada, most previously reported specimens of this adventive species were captured in pitfall and Luminoc pitfall traps in or adjacent to agricultural fields (Klimaszewski et al. 2007a). However, this species is not restricted to agricultural habitats in Canada. In New Brunswick, this species was captured in marsh litter in a cattail and sedge marsh, in leaf litter along the margin of a vernal pond in a mixed forest, in drift material along a lake shore, and from among decaying corncobs and cornhusks in a forested residential area adjacent to a mixed forest. Th is species was Map 47. Collection localities in New Brunswick, Canada of Dinaraea angustula. collected in April, May, August, and September. Th is species probably overwinters in the adult stage. Collection method: sifting. Distribution in Canada and Alaska. AB, QC, NB, ON, PE, NS (Klimaszewski et al. 2007a; Gouix and Klimaszewski 2007; Majka and Klimaszewski 2008b).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".