Bibliographic record
Abstract
PLATYPOLYNEMA Ogloblin, 1960 (Figs 257–262) Platypolynema Ogloblin, 1960a: 7. Type species: Platypolynema cautum Ogloblin, 1960, by original designation. Ogloblin, 1967: 192 (further diagnosis); Triapitsyn & Berezovskiy, 2002: 618 (diagnosis), 619 (key). Diagnosis. Face with subantennal sulcus ventral to each torulus and without pit medially to each torulus (Fig. 259); toruli separated by at least their own height from transverse trabecula (Fig. 259); propleura abutting each other anterior to prosternum; mesosoma depressed (Fig. 258), 1.67× as wide as high (as measured at level of hind wing insertion on one card-mounted specimen); fore wing with distinct narrowing just distal to venation (Fig. 260); venation with parastigma long, so proximal macrochaeta well separated from distal macrochaeta; petiole in dorsal view quadrate (Fig. 262), attached probably to gt 1 (attachment point not clear); ovipositor strongly produced anteriorly ventral to mesosoma and slightly but distinctly exserted beyond apex of gaster (Fig. 258). Remarks. Platypolynema belongs to the Polynema group of genera. Platypolynema appears to be most similar to Kalopolynema in having distinct subantennal sulci (Triapitsyn & Berezovskiy 2002). It is also similar to Polynemula in having the ovipositor extending anteriorly ventral to the mesosoma. That may just be a convergence that occurs in unrelated genera with very long ovipositors that often parasitize eggs laid deep in plant tissue, such as in the aerenchyma of water plants. The apparent absence of propodeal carinae (Fig. 262) distinguish Platypolynema from Polynemula. The absence of pits between the toruli also distinguishes Platypolynema from Polynemula. Neotropical hosts. Unknown. The only known Platypolynema species appears to be associated with plants in or near water. Important references. Ogloblin (1960), Triapitsyn & Berezovskiy (2002).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".