Bibliographic record
Abstract
<i>Atheta remulsa</i> Casey, 1910 <b>CANADA: NOVA SCOTIA: Cape Breton Co.:</b> Scatarie Island, Northwest Cove, 10.VIII.2005, K.R. Aikens and A. MacDonald, mixed forest, mushroom on dead wood, (3, CBU); Sydney (CBU campus), 5.X.2003, D.B. McCorquodale, (6, CBU); <b>Halifax Co.:</b> Point Pleasant Park, 9.IX.2001, C.G. Majka, red spruce forest, on <i>Amanita gemmata</i>, (1, CGMC); Point Pleasant Park, 23.VIII.2002, C.G. Majka, red spruce forest, on gilled fungi, (3, CGMC); Big Indian Lake, 9.VIII.2003, P. Dollin, red spruce forest (80-120 years), in rotting mushroom, (1, NSMC); Waverley, 10.VIII.1965, B. Wright, mixed forest, pitfall trap, (1, NSMC); <b>Inverness Co.:</b> Baddeck Forks, 28.X.1996, D.B. McCorquodale, (3, CBU); <b>Lunenburg Co.:</b> Bridgewater, 1.VII.1965, B. Wright, (1, NSMC). <b>ONTARIO: Algoma Co.:</b> Lake Superior Provincial Park, 3.IX.1980, 6.IX.1980, R. Baranowski, (1m, LFC; 1f, LFC; 2f, MZLU); Michipicoten River (South of Wawa), 5.IX.1980, 8.IX.1980, R. Baranowski, (3m, LFC; 3m, MZLU); <b>Nippising Co.:</b> Algonquin Provincial Park near Brent, 20.VIII.1980, 21.VIII.1980, 22.VIII.1980, R. Baranowski, (8m, MZLU; 6f, MZLU; 1m, LFC); <b>Sudbury Co.:</b> Mattagami, 27.VIII.1980, R. Baranowski, (1m, MZLU; 1m, LFC; 1f, LFC); 30 km southwest of Foleyet, 30.VIII.1980, R. Baranowski, (3f, LFC; 2f, MZLU; 2 MZLU). <b>QUÉBEC:</b> Hull, Gatineau Park, near Ramsey Lake, 17.VIII.1980, R. Baranowski, (2f, MZLU). <i>Atheta remulsa</i> is newly recorded in Nova Scotia, Ontario, and Québec. In Nova Scotia it has been found in mixed and red spruce (<i>P. rubens</i>) forests on decaying and living gilled fungi including <i>Amanita gemmata</i>.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".