MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6949640720 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.16793239

seisbench/seisbench: SeisBench v0.10 - SkyNet, SeisDAE and a more powerful model API

2025· other· en· W6949640720 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLibraries and Information Services
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)Function (biology)Set (abstract data type)CUDANoise reduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Major updates The SkyNet model is now available in SeisBench. SkyNet is specifically designed to pick phase arrivals at regional distances (up to 20 degree) and also comes with a set of weights to distinguish between Pn, Pg, Sn and Sg phases. With SeisDAE, there's now a second denoising model available in SeisBench. In addition, there are plenty of new functions to train denoising model and a new tutorial notebook walking you through the process step by step. A few tweaks make the use of models more powerful and convenient. The to_preferred_device function automatically moves the model to CUDA or Apple Silicon if available. Overlaps can now be specified as fractions of the input length instead of sample. In addition, models can now have dynamic input length depending on the data. Thanks to everyone how contributed to this release with feedback, issues, and especially with PRs! What's Changed skynet integration by @albertleonardo in https://github.com/seisbench/seisbench/pull/355 Enable specifying overlaps in annotate as fractions instead (Closes #353) by @yetinam in https://github.com/seisbench/seisbench/pull/357 Updated model training tutorial by @yetinam in https://github.com/seisbench/seisbench/pull/361 Enable models with dynamic input and output length by @yetinam in https://github.com/seisbench/seisbench/pull/363 Training an own Denoiser model by @JanisHe in https://github.com/seisbench/seisbench/pull/360 Add to_preferred_device function by @yetinam in https://github.com/seisbench/seisbench/pull/362 pre-commit: using ruff by @miili in https://github.com/seisbench/seisbench/pull/368 Full Changelog: https://github.com/seisbench/seisbench/compare/v0.9.0...v0.10.0

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1810.225

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicLibraries and Information ServicesFrench-language works237,207