MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6949640720 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.16793239

seisbench/seisbench: SeisBench v0.10 - SkyNet, SeisDAE and a more powerful model API

2025· other· en· W6949640720 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLibraries and Information Services
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)Function (biology)Set (abstract data type)CUDANoise reduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Major updates The SkyNet model is now available in SeisBench. SkyNet is specifically designed to pick phase arrivals at regional distances (up to 20 degree) and also comes with a set of weights to distinguish between Pn, Pg, Sn and Sg phases. With SeisDAE, there's now a second denoising model available in SeisBench. In addition, there are plenty of new functions to train denoising model and a new tutorial notebook walking you through the process step by step. A few tweaks make the use of models more powerful and convenient. The to_preferred_device function automatically moves the model to CUDA or Apple Silicon if available. Overlaps can now be specified as fractions of the input length instead of sample. In addition, models can now have dynamic input length depending on the data. Thanks to everyone how contributed to this release with feedback, issues, and especially with PRs! What's Changed skynet integration by @albertleonardo in https://github.com/seisbench/seisbench/pull/355 Enable specifying overlaps in annotate as fractions instead (Closes #353) by @yetinam in https://github.com/seisbench/seisbench/pull/357 Updated model training tutorial by @yetinam in https://github.com/seisbench/seisbench/pull/361 Enable models with dynamic input and output length by @yetinam in https://github.com/seisbench/seisbench/pull/363 Training an own Denoiser model by @JanisHe in https://github.com/seisbench/seisbench/pull/360 Add to_preferred_device function by @yetinam in https://github.com/seisbench/seisbench/pull/362 pre-commit: using ruff by @miili in https://github.com/seisbench/seisbench/pull/368 Full Changelog: https://github.com/seisbench/seisbench/compare/v0.9.0...v0.10.0

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2370.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it