Bibliographic record
Abstract
110 Euura excisa (Thomson, 1863) Fig. 116 Nematus excisus Thomson, 1863: 628. Lectotype designated below. Lygaeonematus strandi Konow, 1901a: 92. Lectotype designated below. Synonymy by Lindqvist (1952). Diagnosis Mostly black, labrum and partly clypeus pale; head behind eyes sometimes pale; tegula pale;pterostigma pale; valvifer 2, hypopygium posteriorly, tergum 9 partly, and tergum 10 pale; metafemur apically pale; metatibia pale; hind tarsus pale or brown; claws with small subapical tooth, mesepisternum (usually?) matt, valvula 3 in dorsal view elongate, thin and gradually tapering. Most closely related species are E. declinata and E. scotonota (character states in parentheses), from which it differs by having claws with small subapical tooth (usually bifid or with large subapical tooth) and matt mesepisternum (smooth). Additional characters like its mostly black body, pale pterostigma and tibiae enable it to be separated from all other species of Euura relatively easily. Male unknown, but penis valve could be similar to the closely related E. declinata and E. scotonota. Type material examined Lectotype Nematus excisus, here designated SWEDEN • ♀; Norlandia [Lapland, probably Sweden]; C.H. Boheman leg.; MZLU, MZLU2017274. Lectotype Lygaeonematus strandi, here designated NORWAY – Nordland • ♀; Hadsel; 68.5° N, 15.0° E; E. Strand leg.; SDEI, GBIF-GISHym3880. Host plants Bistorta vivipara (L.) Delarbre. Genetics COI Based on 5 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 1.41% and the nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 1.22%, is Euura fuscomaculata. Nuclear Based on 5 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 0.15% (0.34% based on haplotypes of individual females). The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.71%, is Euura scotonota. Distribution and material examined Holarctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, Greenland (only genetics), Norway, and Sweden.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".