Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vibilia pyripes Bovallius, 1887 (figures 1, 2) Vibilia pyripes Bovallius, 1887a: 10; 1887b: 71, pl. 10, figures 23–30. Vibilia hirondellei Chevreux, 1900: 126–129, pl. 15, figure 4. Vibilia grandicornis Chevreux, 1900: 131–134, pl. 16, figure 2. Materials examined. See table 3. Description of female. Head length three-quarters height, about 0.6 times as long as pereonites 1 and 2 combined, nearly rectangular when viewed laterally. Rostrum about one-sixth as long as remainder of head and slightly bent downward. Eyes oblong (pear-shaped in male), well packed with ocelli, height about 1.6 times length which is slightly less than one-half (about two-thirds in male) as long as the head. Antenna 1 length equal to combined length of head, pereonite 1 and two-thirds of pereonite 2, flagellum twice as long as peduncle, 1.7 times as long as high. Maxilliped outer lobes narrow, more than three times as long as wide, with a few strong teeth on the proximal two-thirds of inner margin, outer margin smooth with a few fine setae. Pereon 1.4 times as long as pleon, height increasing posteriorly, pereonite 7 about 1.5 times as high as pereonite 1. Posterodistal margin of pereonites 3–7 bent posteriorly. Coxae increasing in length and height from pereonite 1 to 4, then decreasing to 7; ventral margin of coxae 5 and 6 with a notch in mid-length. Pereopod 1 simple, anterior margin of basis with a slight bulge at proximal third, propus with posterior margin finely serrated and distal margin as wide as dactyl. Pereopod 2 subchelate, carpal process reaching to one-third of propus. Pereopod 5 about 1.5 times as long as pereopod 3, basis slightly longer than ischium and merus combined, propus three-quarters as long as merus and carpus combined and slightly longer than basis. Pereopod 6 carpus, anterior margin with fine dentition and three large spines, the spines with finely branched margins distally. Pereopod 7 with complete segmentation, basis 0.6 times as long as ischium to dactyl combined, posterodistal corner with a strong protrusion reaching mid-length of merus; carpus and propus not produced at anterodistal corner; dactyl finely scaled on distal half of posterior surface. Pleon about 2.6 times as long as urosome, pleonites 1–3 subequal in length. Posterodistal corner of pleonites 1 and 2 rounded, of pleonite 3 angular. Urosomites 2 and 3 fused, laterodistal corners slightly produced. Uropod 1 protopod 1.6 times as long as exopod. Uropod 3 protopod broad, as long as wide, distally widening, as long as endopod. Telson separate from double urosomite, rounded, slightly broader than long. Size. Female: 4.80–8.72 mm; male: 2.80–7.00 mm. Distribution. Pacific Ocean: Japan; South China Sea; New Zealand. This is the first record of this species for the eastern Pacific Ocean. In the present study, this species occurred in 17 samples, mostly shallower than 250 m, with an exception at 1253– 1207 m and has a relatively wide distributional range from 20°S to 33°N and 119°W eastward to the continents of the Americas. Atlantic Ocean: 51°N– 43°S; Newfoundland; Azores. Indian Ocean: Gulf of Oman; Arabian Sea; near Equator.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".